The incentive for vaccinations is a return to normalcy. It's laughable that you'd even try to debate that point.the incentive for vaccinations is not unmasking.
that's incredibly uninformed.
they are part of the return to normalcy. Change is a process, not an event.The incentive for vaccinations is a return to normalcy. It's laughable that you'd even try to debate that point.
when we're at 80%.The last part.
That room was at 100%. Which is the point of the tweet that you're debating.when we're at 80%.
what are we at today?
Yesvaccinations don't mitigate the risk of break-out variants. Done half-assedly, they might reasonably make the risk much worse.
no. that room is vaccinated. That's not the same as knowing we're immune.That room was at 100%. Which is the point of the tweet that you're debating.
Herd Immunity. It's a thing.what is this 80% shit? lmao
haha you mofos
I didHerd Immunity. It's a thing.
come, join the herd.
how do you know? are you relying on a PCR result with a cycle count of 40?I did
many months ago
the old fashioned way
The people in that room are beyond the capacity of herd immunity.no. that room is vaccinated. That's not the same as knowing we're immune.
we're back to talking about breakout variants until we're at herd immunity.
That's not true. Undermining public confidence has a great cost. The odds of those 10 vaccinated people harboring some super strain are virtually nil. In this case the cost greatly outweighs the benefit. Masks at one point in time, were low cost. Depending on the situation, they still are, but masks were never no cost.Cost of masks is nothing. Benefit is controlling mitigating risk of lethal or infectious variant.
Lowering the cycle count actually appears to have lead to larger spread of covid.how do you know? are you relying on a PCR result with a cycle count of 40?
that's not a measure of developing immunity.
If it behaves as we are led to believe it behaves I was exposed repeatedlyhow do you know? are you relying on a PCR result with a cycle count of 40?
that's not a measure of developing immunity.
i don't mean that to be personal, just pointing out that WE don't really have a way of knowing how many of us have adequate natural immunity.If it behaves as we are led to believe it behaves I was exposed repeatedly
I won't get into details again, wasn't a fun time
or it's really spreading and before it wasn't really spreading as bad as the political health organizations wanted you to believe.Lowering the cycle count actually appears to have lead to larger spread of covid.
The people in that room are beyond the capacity of herd immunity.
That's not true. Undermining public confidence has a great cost. The odds of those 10 vaccinated people harboring some super strain are virtually nil. In this case the cost greatly outweighs the benefit. Masks at one point in time, were low cost. Depending on the situation, they still are, but masks were never no cost.
No WE don'ti don't mean that to be personal, just pointing out that WE don't really have a way of knowing how many of us have adequate natural immunity.
It creates the appearance that vaccination is in fact not the path to normalcy that the public has been promised. It's kind of funny that you're looking at the TSA line and instead of saying "Wow, this is a waste of time." you're trying to explain to people how dangerous water bottles and shoes really are.how does wearing a mask undermine public confidence?