Oh, well. He's an intelltual, better listen to him
General COVID Darwin Awards
- Thread starter Wintermute
- Start date
literally what an appeal to authority looks like in the wild.
beautiful.
amazing.
betadine is the business, everyone should have some in the medicine cabinet.
no one should drink it.
It's not an appeal to authority, his qualifications were demanded.
An appeal to authority is when the foundation of an argument is based on an authority whose expertise is beyond question and therefore the argument is correct.
I think dumbing it down to "I took an exam" is thinning that a bit too much.
I just noticed that wording to be funny. It wasn't "I had to pass a class." It was "I took an exam." There's also that taking a course as part of a program doesn't necessarily make you an expert on all matters under that subject. Ie, I can guarantee you that he did not study the effects of people wearing cloth masks they never change and don't wash. Of course that's without unpacking the value of his credentials as it relates to virology.
Royal College of Fancypantaloons, they call tests and most other things by stoupid wourds.
And his credentials, to me, are worthless because metric system.
Pounds, inches, feet motherfuckers!
That may read a little harsh but these Eurofolk...
I guarantee you that he didn't study for his exam by looking at Facebook memes that his auntie posted and watching YouTube videos with spooky background music and pictures of Bill Gates in the thumbnail.
??
That's true.
This is a good and moral stance under most circumstances, but there are also hundreds of thousands if not millions of people taking pride in obstinately refusing to engage in even basic prevention tactics like wearing masks, not having massive gatherings and refusing vaccination. These things increase the likelihood that others will die. It's not much different from someone carelessly flicking a lit cigarette into a dry forest or driving drunk routinely. You're right to say celebrating death is cruel, but the wanton carelessness and diaregard of many of the people being lampooned in this thread who say it's just not their problem or altogether imaginary in the face of other grieving families is arguably much more cruel.
It's always funny when the faux compassionate crowd outs themselves.
So your not into freedom of choice.
It is a lot different than driving drunk or starting a forest fire FYI.
I think your way off on this my friend.
The unvaccinated are guilty of nothing, you are assuming a healthy person is sick...you are assuming they are harming people.
That is called profiling. Your better than that.
I hope in time you can realize where your current line of thinking leads.
"Everybody should get on the booster plan or they are doing harm to everybody around them" is one of the most ridiculous lines of thinking I have ever seen pushed.
.
Their methodology is good. Hunting for oxygen use is probably a good metric.
The big thing would be to caution the VA where they are not under the same pressure to keep patients in observation status or get them home as We usually are in every other hospital system.
There's not a single coronavirus patient that's been admitted to my hospital that didn't require oxygen in the last year. We stopped putting anyone in for observation (a defined 24-hour. Which is classified as such and easily data mined because it does not inpatient) for simply having coronavirus over a year ago.
Positive? Sats are good? Dyspnea precautions and go home.
Likewise testing is not universal and it's not universal in most hospitals here. I do see that happening in academic centers though and I'm not sure what proportion of patients are being treated there.
I don't think there's anything about agendas here that can be gleaned from that article.@JakePaulsBeard
inaccuracies and agendas in hospitalization counts?
Our Most Reliable Pandemic Number Is Losing Meaning
A new study suggests that almost half of those hospitalized with COVID-19 have mild or asymptomatic cases.www.theatlantic.com
Their methodology is good. Hunting for oxygen use is probably a good metric.
The big thing would be to caution the VA where they are not under the same pressure to keep patients in observation status or get them home as We usually are in every other hospital system.
There's not a single coronavirus patient that's been admitted to my hospital that didn't require oxygen in the last year. We stopped putting anyone in for observation (a defined 24-hour. Which is classified as such and easily data mined because it does not inpatient) for simply having coronavirus over a year ago.
Positive? Sats are good? Dyspnea precautions and go home.
Likewise testing is not universal and it's not universal in most hospitals here. I do see that happening in academic centers though and I'm not sure what proportion of patients are being treated there.
I read it.
You likened not being vaccinated to driving drunk routinely or flicking a lit cig into the forest.
To me that is ludicrous.
I do not view people not getting vaccinated as carelessness, I view it as freedom of choice.
Last edited:
Am i missing the part about millions of people not wearing masks, gathering in numbers, and refusing vaccination?
If so I disagree...that is their right and I support it.
Last edited:
IIRC, testing is universal at the VA
Yes that's what I was referencing. The article says they are universal and I'm saying that I don't think that's true in most places otherwise... outside of academic centers
gotcha. i assume that's the case, but they do mention that they have trend correlation in places that don't have universal testing.