General Russia Ukraine round 2 Price hike boogaloo

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
61,667
56,891
my friend is non-binary. and i always call her "her". i literally just did it in that sentence lol

but i refuse to use a plural for them (although i did in the prior sentence as well as the post above). so the term she told me to use for her is "human."

i dont get it at all. but human is a great person. so its all good. and human knows i love human so human doesnt get mad at me when i accidentally refer to human as "she" or "her" :)
Why do I feel like your non-binary friend only dates men?
 
M

member 3289

Guest
im fine using other terms. but i draw my line at terms that are gramatically incorrect! (due to plural) lol
It's been used in everyday situations since long before the whole gender identity fad.

While you're on the phone, someone knocks on your door. You know it's one person but don't know the person's gender. You say to the person on the phone, "Hold on let me see who it is and what they want."

I think this unknown gender/unfamiliar person use of the word "they" for a single individual is where the Gen Z gender labels originate.

Also NJ is shit. Fuck u
 

kaladin stormblessed

Nala fanboy
Apr 24, 2017
17,676
20,064
It's been used in everyday situations since long before the whole gender identity fad.

While you're on the phone, someone knocks on your door. You know it's one person but don't know the person's gender. You say to the person on the phone, "Hold on let me see who it is and what they want."

I think this unknown gender/unfamiliar person use of the word "they" for a single individual is where the Gen Z gender labels originate.

Also NJ is shit. Fuck u
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest

Sources: The Russian authorities were not ready for the sanctions imposed against the country. Possibly because Putin hid the invasion plan from many of his subordinates.
March 2, 2022

We talked with sources in the government and interlocutors close to the financial and economic bloc of the Cabinet of Ministers. From their words follows:
Many high-ranking officials - members of the cabinet of ministers and heads of large state-owned companies - were not ready for Vladimir Putin's decision to start a war in Ukraine. According to one of the senior officials, it follows that he "did not know" that this would be a full-scale invasion. Some of them were shocked by the news about the introduction of troops. "That's fucked up," a senior White House source responded succinctly . According to a source close to the government, the cabinet was preparing for sanctions in response to the recognition of the independence of the LPR and DPR, but was not aware of the decision on a major war.

It turned out that the government was not preparing for the level of sanctions pressure that the whole world began to exert on Russia in response to aggression. All the last time Russian officials seemed to be the most terrible measure to disconnect from SWIFT, says a source in the leadership of one of the state-owned companies. They were preparing for such a scenario - since the beginning of the year, several meetings were held in the government on the topic of possible sanctions, and in large companies they conducted so-called stress tests in case Russia was disconnected from SWIFT, a ban on the supply of Western software, servers and chips. However , no one calculated the effect of the most terrible sanctions, for example, on Russian reserves, as well as the withdrawal of almost all Western companies from the Russian market.follows from the words of our interlocutors.

In the past, the Russian leadership has shied away from overly aggressive policies under the influence of economists' scenarios. For example, in March 2014, the government calculated the risks of joining the Donetsk, Lugansk and Kharkiv regions to Russia , and then this step was not taken, among other things, because the Russian economy, according to calculations, was not ready for this, recalls a former government official.

“Everything is in a frenzy,” says a source close to the presidential administration, answering a question about the prevailing mood among Kremlin employees. But officials cannot resign, because it would be a betrayal: “You can only resign to the zone,” ironically an interlocutor close to the government
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest

In the past, the Russian leadership has shied away from overly aggressive policies under the influence of economists' scenarios. For example, in March 2014, the government calculated the risks of joining the Donetsk, Lugansk and Kharkiv regions to Russia , and then this step was not taken, among other things, because the Russian economy, according to calculations, was not ready for this, recalls a former government official.


We should have responded more harshly to Crimea? They calculated right. We weren't going to do shit
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
"Can you put a price on peace?"
Looks like sanctions are a trillion dollar hit and growing.
Russia GDP is 1.5 trillion. It'll take years for them to be in full effect.
So maybe Russia loses 1/3 of it's economy for three years. Let's say it cost them that for five.

They aren't giving up Ukraine for that.
I think we would have to wait for the unpredictability to then disrupt outside investment for a harder hit.

I think the hits on the oligarchs and Putin are the piece that will have the fastest action currently. You're a billionaire Russian, but now you can't use your wealth outside of Russia. That might be okay for some but for most of these guys they are jet setting and enjoying the West that they vocalize against. I'm not sure much of Russia has the culture of enjoying a penthouse in London or New York well you can get some of the world's best restaurants etc. If you can't go to Monaco with your yacht, that's now seized? What's the money worth? If you lose the lifestyle it brings you.
 

Speaker to Animals

encephalopathetic
May 16, 2021
8,161
7,370
Looks like sanctions are a trillion dollar hit and growing.
Russia GDP is 1.5 trillion. It'll take years for them to be in full effect.
So maybe Russia loses 1/3 of it's economy for three years. Let's say it cost them that for five.

They aren't giving up Ukraine for that.
I think we would have to wait for the unpredictability to then disrupt outside investment for a harder hit.

I think the hits on the oligarchs and Putin are the piece that will have the fastest action currently. You're a billionaire Russian, but now you can't use your wealth outside of Russia. That might be okay for some but for most of these guys they are jet setting and enjoying the West that they vocalize against. I'm not sure much of Russia has the culture of enjoying a penthouse in London or New York well you can get some of the world's best restaurants etc. If you can't go to Monaco with your yacht, that's now seized? What's the money worth? If you lose the lifestyle it brings you.
I'm basically stuck off to one side of the crowd around the table, watching the die fall and hoping for the game to end early and cleanly.

We're past that. This is the most unnerving world situation since I was a member of the Reagan Youth.
 

Wintermute

Putin is gay
Apr 24, 2015
5,816
9,190
Apparently they are kinetic energy-based weapons to knock ICBM MIRVs off-course during the terminal phase.
 
M

member 1013

Guest
This will trigger you, but the Ukrainians were playing with nuclear fire here too. They have obligations as well.

Don't set up your own defensive weaponry near nuclear power plants to force the battle on those terms.

Foreign countries need to step in.

Part of the negotiations should be the banning of both sides from setting up weapons near nuclear plants.
ThIs WiLl tRiGgEr U!”
 
M

member 1013

Guest
They will start turning on the Ukies soon enough, just as they turned on Polish carpenters. Being white helps a lot, but a foreign-speaking immigrant is still ultimately an immigrant to them.
To be fair, polish carpenters have awful standards