Well the events which inspired this thread don't really follow that narrative, now do they?
Things change and people should be free to change laws and not accept something which isn't working for them.
Don't fall into the trap of thinking that because I'm against this massive level of immigration that I'm anti-immigration. (Edit) What I'm saying is if it's causing a problem and the citizens of a country don't want them then they should be free to say no.
Jesus Christ
- Youre using one example of many examples, single males in most populations are the biggest committers of crimes in terms of frequency and maybe even severity
- Which totalitarian regime is taking in these refugees against the overwhelming mandate of their people? North Korea now taking in Syrians?
Is Germany not a democracy?
"Germany is a parliamentary democracy governed under the constitution of 1949, which became the constitution of a united Germany in 1990. The federal president is the head of state but has little influence on government. The president is elected for a five-year term by a federal convention, which meets only for this purpose and consists of the Bundestag and an equal number of members elected by the state parliaments. The chancellor, elected by an absolute majority of the Bundestag for a four-year term, is the head of government. There is a bicameral Parliament. The Bundesrat, or Federal Council (the upper house), has 69 seats, with each state having three to six representatives depending on the state's population. The Bundestag, or Federal Assembly (the lower house), has 598 deputies who are elected for four years using a mixed system of proportional representation and direct voting; additional seats are added when a party wins more seats through direct voting than it would have by proportional representation alone."