They know every way to skin a cat, it's true.
Germany Mall Shootings
- Thread starter seekntruth
- Start date
It's a social engineering project; our oligarchs are navigating uncharted waters to the best of their ability. Improvising, making it shit up as they move along, much of it contradictory. They're like astronauts in a way,. I'm actually hopefully they get hung up on Uranus and we never hear from them again. We can go back to monarchy or something.
"fiercely intelligent"
lol all those national IQ stats EY finger fucks himself over are self reported, Korea had 200 Professors caught out for plagiarizing their doctorate FFS
NE Asians arent any smarter than Australian aboriginals, anyone who has dealt with both will know this, values are different though hence the nicer stuff the rice eaters have
Britain in between Vietnam and Hong Kong on yet another descending list!
That's not really consistent. Judging someone by the strength of their religious fanaticism isn't the same as judging them by their religion.
In any case, it would be difficult to enforce, as people could just lie. The idea being put forward is that we ban people from countries that have high numbers of people identifying under a certain religion. My additional point is that for consistency, the argument should be religious countries in general.
Keep this shit at center level. Next person in bringing up ethniciry I might cockslap.
We have a bunch of Persian Shias here on the shore. Really nice folks, cultivated. you can't tell em they're not white either, even though they're kinda brown. And they're Muslims. There are millions of Shias worldwide. The extent of there involvement in this jihad is that they're the only ones with boots on the ground in Syria fighting it. So it's no good describing this scourge as Islamic terrorism, you need a narrower definition lest the American people get hoodwinked again into bombing the shit out of another innocent country (Iran).
It's in the pipeline, the think tanks in Washington have been hectoring Obama to do it for eight years. Hilary act quickly if she gets the chance.
It's in the pipeline, the think tanks in Washington have been hectoring Obama to do it for eight years. Hilary act quickly if she gets the chance.
Then you define a person by his country, is that not intrinsically the same if not worse than judging him by his or her religion (which they have some control over to some extent).
Yes, it's terrible. I certainly don't support it but that is the common argument. Don't allow people from Muslim based countries.
ah right, that just means keep brown people out really.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfR00nu5xQw
I used strange flow this to bitches in my hood. They all sit incintounent,. I am tiredm U guve ut 34= mothers untuk proper euros start sta bbbing bithces,
Yes that is very true but only in proportion with the wider pro freedom debate.
I'm not familiar with that debate, what are the arguments?
1
1031
Guest
I don't think that's what he was saying. What I received is that if someone defines themselves by their religion, then, based on what you know about that religion, it would be impossible not to take that into consideration when assessing that person.
It's what people do and there's nothing right or wrong about it.
I can understand that but the reality is that even those who identify and define themselves by their religion are diverse. Some strong Muslims, for example, are scholars and educators whereas others blow people up. Some Christians are great people, some are racist thugs. Many (most?) religious people compartmentalise their faith from their every day personality.
I know he stated that it's more than just Christian or Muslim etc but how do you realistically determine and police that?
1
1031
Guest
You don't. You let people think how they want to think. Sometimes we're right and sometimes we're wrong and it's been like that as long as our history shows. As long as we ask people to express and articulate why they feel or think this way or that then we'll get somewhere, albeit slowly. What kills any progress is censoring discussion.
So basically the saudi rulers have practices that go against islam. Off the top of my head they have interest banks, they have a monarchy and as my jihadi friends would say "they ally with the kuffar init" regarding their relations with the US. So they make Takfir on them and tell everyone other muslim who doesn't do the same that they are also not a muslim.
While the first two are not permissable in Islam. The third one isn't that much of a issue in certain circumstances but again this does not make someone a non muslim because they commit what we would call sins.
There are many more examples just can't think of any at the moment.
So when you talk about someone's religion influencing your assessment of them, you are not suggesting you should act on it?
1
1031
Guest
No.
Not acting can mean a lot of things as can acting. It depends on the situation and the people involved.
Didn't you once automatically assume that I had hacking skills just because I'm a rice eater, huh? Ya curry munchin' abo
Shit, maybe I was the one who broke the myth, lol
Immigrant crime of the day:
Syrian refugee wielding machete kills 1, injures 2 in Reutlingen, Germany
Just one more isolated incident I guess ...
Syrian refugee wielding machete kills 1, injures 2 in Reutlingen, Germany
Just one more isolated incident I guess ...
1 dead, 2 injured? Talk about underachievement.
- Jan 14, 2015
- 12,562
- 16,994
they're not sending their best folks. keep taking in this riff raff and this will be happening a few times a day.