M
member 1013
Guest
He is a nice guy and wil make Murica great again
Im glad u post TYT stuff, bc I unsubbed to them a couple months ago. I have OCD with the shit I sub to (need to watch everything) and the put out to much to keep up and not burn my entire day lol
I like them tho. Pretty sure cenK or whareverse his name is, is from a town close to me (not now, but where he came from in jersey)
Also pretty sure I would have hated every fucken mouth breather host on this channel 2 years ago, when I was a flat-taxer
Who knew that
@Mix6APlix was a published author?
@Mix6APlix was a published author?
M
member 1013
Guest
WTF man. I am not a liberal.
Last edited:
M
member 1013
Guest
D
Deleted member 1
Guest
In 1975, Time magazine panned the novel as a "bilious tirade" that only required a response because it "arrives trailing clouds of praise from French savants, including Dramatist Jean Anouilh ('A haunting book of irresistible force and calm logic'), with the imprint of a respected U.S. publisher and a teasing pre-publication ad campaign ('The end of the white world is near')".[5] Kirkus Reviews compared the novel to Mein Kampf,[6] while Jeffrey Hart in the National Review lauded it, stating "in freer and more intelligent circles in Europe, the book is a sensation and Raspail is a prize-winner…his plot is both simple and brilliant".[7] In 1983, Linda Chavez called the novel "a sickening book", describing it as "racist, xenophobic and paranoid".[8] The December 1994 cover story of The Atlantic Monthly focused on the themes of the novel, analyzing them in the context of international relations.[9] (This was at about the same time that The Social Contract Press chose to bring it back into U.S. publication).[10]
In 2002, Lionel Shriver described the novel as "both prescient and appalling," certainly "racist" but "written with tremendous verbal energy and passion." Shriver writes that the book "gives bilious voice to an emotion whose expression is increasingly taboo in the West, but that can grow only more virulent when suppressed: the fierce resentment felt by majority populations when that status seems threatened."[11]
William F. Buckley, Jr. praised the book in 2004 as "a great novel" that raised questions on how to respond to massive illegal immigration
In 2002, Lionel Shriver described the novel as "both prescient and appalling," certainly "racist" but "written with tremendous verbal energy and passion." Shriver writes that the book "gives bilious voice to an emotion whose expression is increasingly taboo in the West, but that can grow only more virulent when suppressed: the fierce resentment felt by majority populations when that status seems threatened."[11]
William F. Buckley, Jr. praised the book in 2004 as "a great novel" that raised questions on how to respond to massive illegal immigration
This is the left's equivalent of "Obama is a Muslim hellbent on enslaving the world under Sharia Law."
Wut?This is the left's equivalent of "Obama is a Muslim hellbent on enslaving the world under Sharia Law."
I guess the Turner Diaries also raised important questions on how to respond to a civil uprising, too? I think it's possible to have intelligent discussion about immigration without using a book that considers the solution be a Final Solution, don't you?
M
member 1013
Guest
M
member 1013
Guest
Subtlety and nuance?
The world is black and white my friend
You are either a cream pie consuming sodomite or a glorious warrior for freedom and justice (but not for others, only your own)
M
member 1013
Guest
In other news I am master Shit poster
Obama's mentor. The right played Chicken Little with this clip for his entire presidency. And now you're basically doing the same thing.
That's a false equivalency if I've ever seen one. Was that priest a special advisor to Obama and on his National Security Council?
edit: or is your point that repeatedly referencing a book, in regards to immigration, which suggests the best solution to immigration is to kill them all, isn't a bad thing? Because what that priest is saying is hardly shocking or a hate speech.
I'm saying you should judge an elected official by his or her work as an elected official. All this doom and gloom shit is exactly what conservatives did after Obama was elected. I made it 17 seconds into the video you posted before the alt-right was sneakily likened to white supremacy. Give me a break.
The alt-right as a term was created by White Nationalists to rebrand their movement. They've gone on record saying this.
Who are they?
Are you serious with that source? lol
You think Milo Yiannopoulos and Richard Spencer's rhetoric account for any significant percentage of the votes Trump received in November?
fake news.
No, but you're asking about the origins of the alt-right and the ideologies of the people who founded it. I don't consider every Trump voter a member of the alt-right. Many people voted Trump because Hilary is terrible, they wanted change from the status quo, or any number of assorted single issue voters, and finally because Republican is their team.
Do you think Steve Bannon doesn't know the origins of the term alt-right?