General 11th September 20 years on.

Even if it took a big hit from falling debris For it to free fall like that was unusual and highly suspect.

It was a fire induced progressive collapse. They're pretty widely known about.

Plus that little Reptile guy who owned the building slipped up and told them to "pull it".

It could just be a coincidence.

The question you should be asking is "Why would anyone do that as a controlled demolition?"
 
People believed the CDC, FDA, and the media with the Covid narrative. Why not believe NIST and the media with the 9/11 narrative as well. Makes sense.
 
FcaX0C-WAAAB-Kk
 
Very omimous words from the Secretary of Defense just one day prior. "Matter of life and death."

Paper trails were lost the next day and it was never reported on again.
 
Very omimous words from the Secretary of Defense just one day prior. "Matter of life and death."

Paper trails were lost the next day and it was never reported on again.
Building 6 is quite interesting
Would love to see the records and files the El Dorado task force had before they got destroyed

"Building 6 was also home to the El Dorado task force, an interagency money-laundering group from 55 agencies created in 1992. The El Dorado Task Force was responsible for coordinating all major money-laundering investigations in the U.S. In the immediate aftermath of9/11 attacks, these groups would coincidentally be redirected to investigate terrorist financing."


1663809899991.png

The destruction of WTC 6 is one of the many unexplained questions of 9-11. This 8-story building suffered a huge crater in its center which went all the way down to sub-basement levels. What caused the huge crater in the middle of WTC 6?

wtc-infrared_crater_WTC6.jpg

This infrared image shows the large and deep crater in the center of WTC 6 (lower left). There is no explanation for the deep crater that goes into the sublevels of the 8-story building.
 
Last edited:
A few thousand other engineers and architects disagree
I have no special knowledge either way.

The reason I believe thst the twin towers fell due to structural weakening is that the collapse in both of them started from the point of impact, each floor pancaking onto the next. That's dramatically different from WTC7, which looks way more like a controlled demolition in the way it dropped.

The twin towers collapsing due to structural weakening, caused by the impact from the planes blowing away the fireproofing, and the jet fuel burning hot enough to cause the steel to buckle - even if it's all true, it doesn't disprove the theories about 9/11 being an inside job. I prefer to believe otherwise, but what do I know?
 
I have no special knowledge either way.
I'm far from an expert as well
The reason I believe thst the twin towers fell due to structural weakening is that the collapse in both of them started from the point of impact, each floor pancaking onto the next. That's dramatically different from WTC7, which looks way more like a controlled demolition in the way it dropped.
Of course you see the contradiction

FYI Not starting beef, I always enjoy your posts
 
I'm far from an expert as well

Of course you see the contradiction

FYI Not starting beef, I always enjoy your posts
Hey, no beef! I'm just explaining my point of view.

Also, just because WTC7 looks kinda like a controlled demolition to some uneducated plonker like me, doesn't mean it was one.

I don't think the towers were a controlled demolition, and I prefer to believe that WTC7 wasn't either.
 
Back
Top