Why wasn't there a plethora of mass shootings when firearms were much more accessible?But what about dem mass stabbing massacres?
Why wasn't there a plethora of mass shootings when firearms were much more accessible?But what about dem mass stabbing massacres?
too numerous to count... its why you never hear about them, because they are so common its not deemed as news worthy.But what about dem mass stabbing massacres?
You mean before 96?Why wasn't there a plethora of mass shootings when firearms were much more accessible?
It was about the UK here tho.
it's a question of cost and benefit. "ban gun" is a dumb idea because of the huge cost and low likelihood of significant benefit.Guess all those parents can rest a little easier now know nobody’s guns are being taken and if you do the math it really less kids killed this year.
Have you noticed that the vast majority of the gun ban argument isn't based on anything beyond "You need to care about dead kids as much as I do!" ?it's a question of cost and benefit. "ban gun" is a dumb idea because of the huge cost and low likelihood of significant benefit.
it doesn't mean that I don't empathize with the parents of dead kids. But I also empathize with the thousands of parents who's kids kill themselves every year, and the hundreds of thousands that end up in a life of violence and prison because of existing prohibition laws.
Cost high. Benefit low.
Excuse my ignorance, what does this part of your post have to do with gun laws?But I also empathize with the thousands of parents who's kids kill themselves every year
I have noticed that you veil it well, but I'm sure that sometimes you must be totally drunk when posting.Have you noticed that the vast majority of the gun ban argument isn't based on anything beyond "You need to care about dead kids as much as I do!" ?
I have noticed that you veil it well, but I'm guessing that sometimes you must be totally drunk when posting.
Don't be this way.Have you noticed that the vast majority of the gun ban argument isn't based on anything beyond "You need to care about dead kids as much as I do!" ?
Fuck cost. Raise my taxes for this. I’m in. And this should only be step one of what we do to help and protect our children.it's a question of cost and benefit. "ban gun" is a dumb idea because of the huge cost and low likelihood of significant benefit.
it doesn't mean that I don't empathize with the parents of dead kids. But I also empathize with the thousands of parents who's kids kill themselves every year, and the hundreds of thousands that end up in a life of violence and prison because of existing prohibition laws.
Cost high. Benefit low.
In honor of my fallen friend I am changing the term ‘nut hugging’ to mean following someone around berating them or being condescending.Good luck with that!
??
Antagonistic people like this need not be carrying weapons. Are they allowed to do it? Yeah. But why?
I actually agree with everything (although need an accurate definition on "assault weapon") except the liability of gun manufacturers. That makes zero sense.