she was asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic in March, based on when her husband got it.
she didn't start exhibiting debilitating symptoms until June, by which time she was confined to her bed at home for 7 weeks.
did you actually read the story before you posted it?
it's circumstantial, but the only counter to her claim is a personal attack on her and her doctors.
sounds like the insurance company didn't want to pay for the testing, and now they don't want to pay for the consequences of that policy.
sure doesn't seem like the insurance company is blameless in creating this circumstance.
In March people with symptoms, people exposed to people who had positive tests, or people who had traveled to a variety of different locales were told to get tests.
It's not a personal attack to point out that someone didn't follow public health guidelines.
you're assuming that someone didn't follow the public health guidelines based on single-source reporting
False. I live in the jurisdiction where this is alleged to have occurred.
you have no idea if she followed protocol..
you just know protocol, allegedly.
I don't believe so, no.
So her claim is "My husband got it, and I got it from him, but neither of us got a test. Well, I did get a test, but it was negative, but I know I had it because months later I have some health concerns. Therefore "long hauler".
you don't believe so, or you KNOW so?
you don't believe she followed protocol, or you KNOW she didn't follow protocol?
It was stated in daily briefings from our chief medical officer of health.
She claims to have no gotten a test. If her or her husband had symptoms and did not get tests, they were breaking public health guidelines.
They're the ones who make up the protocols.
what if she got a test when she started to experience debilitating symptoms?
she would be following protocol and unable to generate a positive test.
so you haven't actually read protocol, you just know what the Person In Official Hat told you was the protocol.
is this from March, or June of last year?
EDIT to add: and which one of those do you know she violated?
Introduced in March, amended since then as the covid app didn't exist until the summer.
so which of those do you know she violated?
Either 1 or 2, maybe both. If her husband got covid she should have been tested. If either of them had symptoms they should have both been tested. If memory serves her claim is that when she first had symptoms she didn't get tested and when she went and she went and got tested it was negative. That being said, I don't recall a mention of a positive test for either of them just that "they know they had covid".
Hey
@ThatOneDude is it possible for 2 people to live in the same household, one get covid and the other not?
@ThatOneDude is it possible for 2 people to live in the same household, one get covid and the other not?