General Corona virus updates

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

sparkuri

Pulse on the finger of The Community
First 100
Jan 16, 2015
39,049
51,439
This will be the last time I respond to you since you've decided repeating the same question no matter how many times its answered. And only for posterity of those reading along later since you are holding onto this false idea as part of your critical reality...

Comirnaty is in every single vial made at every FDA approved site after the FDA approval, regardless of label. This is as per both the FDA and the judge YOU LINKED.
No Splinty, no.

The data released to the courtroom & legally defined to the best of the judges knowledge, and why it is worded as such, on the active ingredients in the "vaccine" are read as the same.
Pfizer's application for FDA-approval submitted data not released to the FDA(but had info recently released in a FOIA request by the FDA) regarding hand-picked safety and efficacy for the alpha and beta variants.
With incomplete data and full knowledge of the history & dangers of vaccines introduced mid-"pandemic", FDA approval was purposely granted giving the impression to the world that the safety & efficacy of the Pfizer "vaccine"(not bio n tech)( released data)was 'good enough' for FDA approval implying liability.
This was a push to get more people vaccinated with no liability and indemnification still en force. Everybody knew it and that's the way it is.

Deception, lies, deceit, vaccines forever, population control, vaccine-induced dependency, and by the time the alpha-beta Comirnaty is legally distributed under its label, a clarification of "outside variants" will be legally included citing "info available" and approval based on alpha & beta, indemnifying Pfizer forever with an FDA-approved vaccine that through the CDC & vax court bureaucracy will require "variants" to be identified under claim, which isn't being tested for.
This will be your introduction to how this all works, and the social reverberation will look like it does in every other guinea pig country that has to deal with these crimes against humanity.
No recourse & another generation of bright-eyed doctors believing in vaccine science.
Big pharma rules, FDA washes one hand with the other "legally", investors get their 20-1 return, and death and adverse reactions will reshape a society.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
Why would Pfizer make the vaccine at the approved sites and not label it with the brand name?

Because the EUA vials are labeled as such for informed consent of age group that didn't fall under the BLA.

Pfizer can send out EUA labeled BLA compliant vials and use them for either person under EUA or the group falling under BLA. If labeling only with BLA brand you would apparently run afoul of the FDA EUA requirements.

I suspect even the site specific issue has something to do with this kid of detailed bureaucracy to guarantee a company can only make a drug under the very specific approval and not like generics where you have a wide area under the curve to claim bioequivalents.
 

sparkuri

Pulse on the finger of The Community
First 100
Jan 16, 2015
39,049
51,439
Don't get mad. I have a question. :)

Why would Pfizer make the vaccine at the approved sites and not label it with the brand name?
 
M

member 1013

Guest
This will be the last time I respond to you since you've decided repeating the same question no matter how many times its answered. And only for posterity of those reading along later since you are holding onto this false idea as part of your critical reality...

Comirnaty is in every single vial made at every FDA approved site after the FDA approval, regardless of label. This is as per both the FDA and the judge YOU LINKED.
You have the patience of a saint
 

MMAHAWK

Real Gs come from California.America Muthafucker
Feb 5, 2015
15,270
33,304
Nothing says serious pandemic like
Watching masked teachers today sign up for a school day chili potluck