Last edited:
There were indicators before this...
Wisconsin Conservative Group Finds ‘No Evidence Of Widespread Fraud’ In 2020 Election
www.forbes.com
A 10-month-long review of Wisconsin’s 2020 election conducted by a conservative group in the state found no signs of widespread or significant election fraud, according to a new report of its findings, further disproving continued baseless allegations of election fraud as the battleground state undergoes a contentious partisan election audit.
Wisconsin Conservative Group Finds ‘No Evidence Of Widespread Fraud’ In 2020 Election
“In all likelihood, more eligible voters cast ballots for Joe Biden than Donald Trump,” the right-leaning group found, but contended reforms are necessary.
www.forbes.com
Trump just admitted there was no fraud:
“Anybody that doesn’t think there wasn’t massive Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election is either very stupid, or very corrupt!”
Or he is admitting he's very stupid. Or very corrupt.
“Anybody that doesn’t think there wasn’t massive Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election is either very stupid, or very corrupt!”
Or he is admitting he's very stupid. Or very corrupt.
"No evidence of widespread fraud" means that they found some fraud.Wisconsin Conservative Group Finds ‘No Evidence Of Widespread Fraud’ In 2020 Election
A 10-month-long review of Wisconsin’s 2020 election conducted by a conservative group in the state found no signs of widespread or significant election fraud, according to a new report of its findings, further disproving continued baseless allegations of election fraud as the battleground state undergoes a contentious partisan election audit.Wisconsin Conservative Group Finds ‘No Evidence Of Widespread Fraud’ In 2020 Election
“In all likelihood, more eligible voters cast ballots for Joe Biden than Donald Trump,” the right-leaning group found, but contended reforms are necessary.
Ah, the back-stabbing double negative.
Tripped up by grammar agin!
Not necessarily.
Emphasis.
No evidence of widespread fraud.
No! Evidence of widespread fraud.
See?
Cuz there was ‘some’ fraud, such as, the guy who killed his wife and then used her ballot to vote for Trump.
As long as the fraud we're talking about was for Trump, then of course there was some fraud.
I see, but do you see?
Get with the times
Why do I think you're just a dumb shill for retards, whose every "contribution" to political threads - bar none - is moronic low-information fluff?
Because more than a YEAR later, you're STILL pathetically parroting all of the same stupid bullshit that all of them do. Still pathetically claiming that both sides are equally guilty of trying to destroy democracy in America. Absolutely braindead.
??
Because you're unwilling to consider anything that doesn't validate your political opinions.
M
member 1013
Guest
And, if I’m being honest, he can be really mean.
My political opinions like thinking (and stating on here many times, over a span of months) that Joe Biden is not fit for office, and should never have even entered the race? Let alone have been voted in, at age 78?
Shit like that, you mean?
??
That is true, as well.
I can be entirely friendly if you disagree with me politically as well, though. Just be honest about it. ?
??
M
member 1013
Guest
One time u said I was a big poopy doo-doo head ?
