Yeah, nothing about this style of look is attractive to me. She looks like a soul less sex doll. Hugely fake tits, fake ass...the stupid lips...fake eyelashes.
There is a good argument on the reverse end on this being why players want deals. If he played this season and got this same injury he makes less on his new contract than what he got via holdout.
Getting hurt has nothing to do with the deal you already signed. It's football, your career can be over any minute. Something you just have to accept. If you aren't on the field, you have no value to your team.
This was a unique situation though. Seattle did not give him the deal he wanted because he refused their surgery recommendation for a leg injury. They knew he was compromised and were proven right. Only after he broke his leg again did he get the proper work done, and at that point the relationship was broken beyond repair.
Which is why players want the deals the want. They know you can get hurt so why risk it when you have only 1 year left on your contract. That is what they are thinking.
Yeah im not making an argument against why an NFL team does what they do when it comes to negotiating. I'm speaking on the players perspective on how they want to get deals done because they could get hurt/etc. Seahawks were in the right in that situation. Their worries became true. In Aiyuk's situation he was right because he's worries became true.
If an NFL team forced a player to sit until they re-negotiated for less money, it would be the same thing imo.
If a team wanted to that then thats their right. There are protections against this somewhat. The player would still get paid for that contract and would get to enter free agency healthy.
Oh I miss read you. I thought you were talking about a team sitting a player to get a cheaper NEW deal. You mean they want a player to take a pay cut. Yeah teams can do that and do it all the time.Im assuming it would be against the Players Union rules for a team to sit a player until they took less money than agreed on.
BUt it's perfectly fine for a player to sit while they demand MORE money than originally agreed on.
But it's the same principle. For example, Daniel Jones should be forced to re-negotiate to take less money
Players are mostly viewed as unreasonable when they don’t perform. At that point the perception transforms to “they didn‘t earn the money.”
When they underpreform I take no issue with people saying they didn't earn it because that's the here and now. Teams and players are mostly thinking about future promises and performance though.
Sounds good on paper but would be bad for a locker room. Everyone would be pissed at even the most slight down tick in playing time.
Because the teams have power. They are the employer.
Yeah, it would never work i know.
