Im assuming it would be against the Players Union rules for a team to sit a player until they took less money than agreed on.
BUt it's perfectly fine for a player to sit while they demand MORE money than originally agreed on.
But it's the same principle. For example, Daniel Jones should be forced to re-negotiate to take less money
BUt it's perfectly fine for a player to sit while they demand MORE money than originally agreed on.
But it's the same principle. For example, Daniel Jones should be forced to re-negotiate to take less money