You are a little behind on the replies. Read the posts afterBernie didnt say he would tax anyone making $29k at 52%.
All good. Sounds like you have already acknowledged your posting misinformation and fake news.You are a little behind on the replies. Read the posts after
It really should be a bigger story that Trump eats his steaks "well done" with ketchup.
And since his source was basically the brilliant mind of
He didn’t word it eloquently but he has a point. Who cares if minimum wage is $15/hr, if you’re going to tax people at 50-70% of their income, to cover all of the stupid ass socialist programs you’re wanting to implement. I worked for a Dutch company for several years. Beautiful country. Beautiful people. But heavily taxed. And they all wanted (and many did) to move here.And since his source was basically the brilliant mind of@Wild's boy, Charlie Kirk...
View: https://twitter.com/willthisonework/status/1231257693463228416?s=19
Bloomberg is a clown but if he wants to spend HIS money on this, that’s his choice.PS. Bloomberg is a turd that needs to be flushed but I support his crusade to bring this sad truth to light.
Misinformation.Who cares if minimum wage is $15/hr, if you’re going to tax people at 50-70% of their income, to cover all of the stupid ass socialist programs you’re wanting to implement.
So like the 1%bernies proposal also has 52% for people making over 10 million.
You people should have stopped listening to him when he started talking to chairs.Clint Eastwood has lost his damned mind.
Clint Eastwood backs Mike Bloomberg, wishes Trump would be 'more genteel' in office
Gran Torino was good. He lost his mind after that.You people should have stopped listening to him when he started talking to chairs.
He didn't really need to word it better. He just needed to use proper information. But that wouldn't fit his narrative.He didn’t word it eloquently but he has a point. Who cares if minimum wage is $15/hr, if you’re going to tax people at 50-70% of their income, to cover all of the stupid ass socialist programs you’re wanting to implement. I worked for a Dutch company for several years. Beautiful country. Beautiful people. But heavily taxed. And they all wanted (and many did) to move here.
Still a great actor and director. Senile as shit though.Gran Torino was good. He lost his mind after that.
Then none of his proposed programs (free healthcare, free college, etc) are ever going to happen, because you can't give everyone "free" shit without taxing working class Americans 50-70% (or more).Misinformation.
Neither you or anyone you know would be charged a 50-70% tax rate.
The only concern that I have with Bloomberg is that he's actually proving that if you're willing to spend money then you can buy your way into office. He went from nowhere to polling highly because he bought his way there.Bloomberg is a clown but if he wants to spend HIS money on this, that’s his choice.
Im actually a little confused by all the shit talk of Bloomberg financing his own campaign... how is taking money from corporations and private donors any better?
$400 million for Bloomberg is chump change. We keep hearing it like it’s some absurd number but in reality it’s not for a billionaire.
Power.What it should make you everyone question is why would anyone spend that much of their wealth for a $400k a year position?
Didn’t you see the report last week that stated America would save like $450,000,000,000 annually if it went to Medicare ?Then none of his proposed programs (free healthcare, free college, etc) are ever going to happen, because you can't give everyone "free" shit without taxing working class Americans 50-70% (or more).
The analysis, conducted by researchers at Yale University, the University of Florida and the University of Maryland
Speak for yourself...Power.
Again, it’s chump change for Mike.. It’s like one of us spending $100.
The average American family seeing about $2,400 in annual savings (so I'm going to save $200/mo but pay more in taxes? No thanks)Didn’t you see the report last week that stated America would save like $450,000,000,000 annually if it went to Medicare ?
Medicare For All would save $450 billion annually while preventing 68,000 deaths, new study shows
most 89 yr olds are rather senileStill a great actor and director. Senile as shit though.
Once again.. I don't like Bernie's plan overall because I think it will stifle business growth. Also as a healthy person that almost never uses my insurance the difference in my tax increase vs what I'm paying for insurance (my company is small in number of employees so our rates aren't great due to lack of bargaining power) that I'm not using is negligible.
But Kirk and the assholes spouting such horribly inaccurate information scaring a household that makes 100k a year into thinking that now they'll be clearing 48k before the state takes their cut is reprehensible at best.
Details and Analysis of Senator Bernie Sanders’s Tax Plan | Tax Foundation
![]()
Reviewing The Democratic Candidates' Tax Plans. First Up: Bernie Sanders