It shouldn't, but the opinions of people who actually do this for a living should.
But at least I provide sources for the facts that make the basis for my truth, and I don't try to hide my self-interest.
what points did you think were of value?
EDIT to add: FWIW - the whole 'conference' is like an hour long.
he spoke of data from testing
I found that interesting, not that I have seen his data
Sounds like he is one of the people "doing it for a living" to me, so his opinion has some value as does others that are in the field and getting firsthand experience.
With the death rate now getting closer and closer to regular flu I think some of his opinions had some value...this doesn't appear to be the 3% to 8% killer of everybody it infects as was previously speculated/modeled/reported.
I guess we will know soon enough if some of the areas that are opening up have flare ups and outbreaks.
Those that are working and unaffected speaking about those that are not working and about to lose their businesses doesn't hold much weight to me.
That is part of the big equation to me, and of course it is just my opinion.
I do think he and many other medical business owners want to get back to some form of practice and of course income to at least cover overhead and not go under...That is going on here for sure...and of course some practices do not want to open at all and are angry about those that are about to re-open. So those two dudes are thinking of their bottom line as part of their equation.
It is tricky.