you're in Ottawa? or BC?Cases briefly fell off a cliff, now Canada has more daily cases per capita than the U.S.
you're in Ottawa? or BC?Cases briefly fell off a cliff, now Canada has more daily cases per capita than the U.S.
Ontario.you're in Ottawa? or BC?
A required standard of testing is needed...For all Fed labs and whatever other labs.most tests are not done in the fed labs AFAIK. But I haven't heard anything other than following the politically-motivated guidance of the WHO.
He seems fineSage hasn't fought since May '19
I think he had to have facial reconstruction after that KO and a very long rehab
I wondered if he will fight again, now even more since he has some sort of new health problems
Are there details on what is wrong with him now?
Yes he does
it's like there's a difference between "SARS-COV2" and "COVID".
You should check out Josh Rogin on the JRE. It explains a lot of why Fauci has Rogan's name on his mind...it's like there's a difference between "SARS-COV2" and "COVID".
i saw a clip of it on Fauci and funding GoF with Daszak and the rest of the "Friends of The Lab".You should check out Josh Rogin on the JRE. It explains a lot of why Fauci has Rogan's name on his mind...
All you need to find that is to Google "Fauci" and "gain of function".i saw a clip of it on Fauci and funding GoF with Daszak and the rest of the "Friends of The Lab".
i'm optimistic that if someone like Rogan can start to grasp the number and magnitude of the conflicts of interest at play, maybe everyone can. I did find it interesting that Josh said that Fauci restarted funding without higher approval. Entirely believable, but I have to imagine that there's proof - if reports start to ask questions.
the only source for Fauci restarting funding without WH approval is Rogin, and even he says "the details are a little sketchy".All you need to find that is to Google "Fauci" and "gain of function".
I did come across this which seems somewhat related.the only source for Fauci restarting funding without WH approval is Rogin, and even he says "the details are a little sketchy".
I take that to mean he doesn't understand the way funding is approved and money is allocated in the department, not that there's a cover-up.
So basically they were infecting animals, in this case ferrets, and studying the mutations as it went from animal to animal until they didn't have to purposefully infect the animal?I did come across this which seems somewhat related.
Dr. Fauci Backed Controversial Wuhan Lab with U.S. Dollars
Biomedical research ultimately helps protect public health, Dr. Fauci argued in explaining his support for controversial research.www.newsweek.com
I believe it says they were using bats.So basically they were infecting animals, in this case ferrets, and studying the mutations as it went from animal to animal until they didn't have to purposefully infect the animal?
@Filthy is that correct? I can't ask my personal scientist right now because she's in the lab.
"The program funded Shi Zheng-Li, a virologist at the Wuhan lab, and other researchers to investigate and catalogue bat coronaviruses in the wild. This part of the project was completed in 2019.
With ferrets bruh"The program funded Shi Zheng-Li, a virologist at the Wuhan lab, and other researchers to investigate and catalogue bat coronaviruses in the wild. This part of the project was completed in 2019.
A second phase of the project, beginning that year, included additional surveillance work but also gain-of-function research for the purpose of understanding how bat coronaviruses could mutate to attack humans."
that was the original story from last year that where the MSM started questioning the official "Natural Origin" hypothesis and highlighted the strong conflicts that Fauci and others had in forming that hypothesis. There's no doubt about when/why the research was stopped, or when/why it was restarted...I think the question that neither Trump nor Fauci has addressed is "who approved it?"I did come across this which seems somewhat related.
Dr. Fauci Backed Controversial Wuhan Lab with U.S. Dollars
Biomedical research ultimately helps protect public health, Dr. Fauci argued in explaining his support for controversial research.www.newsweek.com
Seems accurate. Want to fite?that was the original story from last year that where the MSM started questioning the official "Natural Origin" hypothesis and highlighted the strong conflicts that Fauci and others had in forming that hypothesis. There's no doubt about when/why the research was stopped, or when/why it was restarted...I think the question that neither Trump nor Fauci has addressed is "who approved it?"
Since their both being silent on that, I'm going to assume that Fauci did it, but it was only possible because of Trump's inadequacy in controlling his administration.
stick your head up your ass and fight for air.Seems accurate. Want to fite?