Why do females think they can hit men and expect no consequences?

[TalkingLeaf]

Mel are you ok? We can make it through this together. You can hit me and brag about it on the interwebs, call my dick small, whatever and however you need to lash out, I'm here for ya, we can make it through this.

 

[1031]

I admit not reading every post. I never hit a woman and have never been hit by a woman.

If a man is being attacked by an aggressive female and he feels as though he may be injured in that attack, then by all means he has the legal right to defend himself.

Every person should have the right to meet violence with violence.

But there is a difference in being attacked by some 5'3" spazz and being attacked by Gabi Garcia, though.

Truthfully, I bet most would agree on when violence is justified, and when too much is too much, if it were looked at on a case by case basis. Hard to speak about this subject in general terms when there are so many variables.

That's the baseline I was looking to establish. Reasonable force is a term that exists for a reason and even that gets exposed to interpretation. I've noticed that people often argue on things without ever really establishing clear definitions of terms....anyhow, I guess that's too straightforward an approach for some

 

[check it]

Dude. Stop. Please. The question was whether a man has the right to defend himself against another person who is either using violence or threatening to use violence. We can agree that violent situations occur for a variety of reasons however, we all must admit that we are not in control of others and sometimes others force violence upon us and, whether through fault of our own, or not, it can be unforeseen. If someone can not answer with either a YES or a NO then it displays an inability to understand the question or an unwillingness to be honest about it.

dude, you know as well as everybody else does that every single person in this world has the right to defend themselves.

happy?

 

[Lamont Cranston]

Dude. Stop. Please. The question was whether a man has the right to defend himself against another person who is either using violence or threatening to use violence. We can agree that violent situations occur for a variety of reasons however, we all must admit that we are not in control of others and sometimes others force violence upon us and, whether through fault of our own, or not, it can be unforeseen. If someone can not answer with either a YES or a NO then it displays an inability to understand the question or an unwillingness to be honest about it.

It's not a black and white topic that you can answer with a yes or no question.

Setting someone up by loading the question to suit your argument is poor form.

 

[1031]

dude, you know as well as everybody else does that every single person in this world has the right to defend themselves.

happy?

I was asking if anyone was disagreeing with that premise.

 

[1031]

It's not a black and white topic that you can answer with a yes or no question.

Setting someone up by loading the question to suit your argument is poor form.

and what was my argument?

 

[check it]

well about 27 people told you no, so i'm not sure what we're doing at this point.

 

[Lamont Cranston]

and what was my argument?

I'm not going to play with you.

You can sit behind your keyboard and play the "I'm-intellectually-smug" game by yourself.

 

[member 1013]

I'm not a chick but y'all can hit me

 

[1031]

It's odd to me that people expect me to "have an angle" so-to-speak. I was just wondering where people stood on this and wanted to start with the basics. It looks as though some of you have projected a bit too much and gone with that instead of steady dialogue.

 

[FeeO]

This kind of response is at odds with your previous one regarding mitigating violence through intelligent discourse. There's really no point in trying to make this personal and confrontational, I find it strange that a person would try to do so, especially given the nature of the topic.

What's a TMMAC Lady and why should that deter any of us from honestly and respectfully disagreeing with them?

I thought that's what I was doing with you. But when you open your comment to me with Dude. Stop. Please, and we have no prior posting acquaintance, I read it as dismissive. If that's your intent, good for me to know. If it's not, good for you to know.

Mostly I'm laughing at myself for breaking my own rule of avoiding these topics.

 

[1031]

I'm not going to play with you.

You can sit behind your keyboard and play the "I'm-intellectually-smug" game by yourself.

Well what the hell else am I supposed to do except sit behind my keyboard on a message board?

 

[Emmery Myers]

Timeline of recent events ;

Blank, you asked a simple yes or no question but mel answered in a more complex way than perhaps you were willing or able to process.

Then you got snarky with her because she wouldn't let you dictate the discussion with your needlessly pedantic reductionism.

Then she broke a broomhandle off in that ass.

Then I laughed.

 

[member 1013]

Ok here is another story I forgot about where I did hit a woman.

It was a long time ago. Sitting at the dinner table. My sister had this new crush named Dan and I was giving her the gears.

"Dan's a little homo, he doesn't like you"

"Dan sucks dick OK? Get over it."

"Maybe if you grew a dick Dan would like you."

Then BAM, she jams her fork all the way up to the handle in my forearm. So you know what this cat did? I punched her. Right in the shoulder. Then I took the fork out and used it to eat my peas.

I got in trouble for hitting her shoulder, but I stand by my actions.

 

[Lamont Cranston]

It's odd to me that people expect me to "have an angle" so-to-speak. I was just wondering where people stood on this and wanted to start with the basics. It looks as though some of you have projected a bit too much and gone with that instead of steady dialogue.

Settle down Mr. Spock.

Your attempt at being intellectual is cheesy.

 

[OhWhopDaChamp]

Mel are you ok? We can make it through this together. You can hit me and brag about it on the interwebs, call my dick small, whatever and however you need to lash out, I'm here for ya, we can make it through this.

he pissed me the fuck off. I eat shif daily from this place. I let people get away with shit I don't normally put up with. It's so deep to other mother fuckers that they make threads and have owners mods and owners waiting for my response. So yeah. When I finally get pissed off I get the fuck off.

Fuck that nigga. And what? Eat my puckered ass.

 

[1031]

I thought that's what I was doing with you. But when you open your comment to me with Dude. Stop. Please, and we have no prior posting acquaintance, I read it as dismissive. If that's your intent, good for me to know. If it's not, good for you to know.

Mostly I'm laughing at myself for breaking my own rule of avoiding these topics.

Again, to make it perfectly clear. I was just wondering if anyone actually felt a man is not within his rights to defend himself against previously stated circumstances. That's it. There's no reason to assume the discussion was supposed to end there or go in any other direction. When a person can't say yes or no to a simple question then I don't really think they're capable of an honest discussion beyond that.

 

[member 1013]

Well what the hell else am I supposed to do except sit behind my keyboard on a message board?

Have you tried sitting in front of it, or perhaps to the side? If you sit on it, you will probably break it.

 

[member 1013]

he pissed me the fuck off. I eat shif daily from this place. I let people get away with shit I don't normally put up with. It's so deep to other mother fuckers that they make threads and have owners mods and owners waiting for my response. So yeah. When I finally get pissed off I get the fuck off.

Fuck that nigga. And what? Eat my puckered ass.

I'm really, really white. Like blindingly.

If your ass is clean I would try to eat it, never have done so.

I didn't know you felt like that re: eating the shit... sorry to hear.

 

[1031]

Settle down Mr. Spock.

Your attempt at being intellectual is cheesy.

I see no reason to be emotionally invested in a simple discussion but find it very telling that it's off-putting to some people. I'm not going to trade insults with you because there's really no point to that.

 

[OhWhopDaChamp]

Mel are you ok? We can make it through this together. You can hit me and brag about it on the interwebs, call my dick small, whatever and however you need to lash out, I'm here for ya, we can make it through this.

Lars. I expect you to rep during my punishment. Pa gon get me

 

[1031]

Timeline of recent events ;

Blank, you asked a simple yes or no question but mel answered in a more complex way than perhaps you were willing or able to process.

Then you got snarky with her because she wouldn't let you dictate the discussion with your needlessly pedantic reductionism.

Then she broke a broomhandle off in that ass.

Then I laughed.

There's no reason she couldn't have offered an answer with that explanation. There was simply no reason to start being insulting. You can defend that if you like. I remember being in a few relationships with women who tried to drag things down to that level....it's sad.

 

[member 1013]

Lars. I expect you to rep during my punishment. Pa gon get me

 

[OhWhopDaChamp]

I admit not reading every post. I never hit a woman and have never been hit by a woman.

If a man is being attacked by an aggressive female and he feels as though he may be injured in that attack, then by all means he has the legal right to defend himself.

Every person should have the right to meet violence with violence.

But there is a difference in being attacked by some 5'3" spazz and being attacked by Gabi Garcia, though.

Truthfully, I bet most would agree on when violence is justified, and when too much is too much, if it were looked at on a case by case basis. Hard to speak about this subject in general terms when there are so many variables.

Take all this win

 

[OhWhopDaChamp]

My. Shit.