Should be easy to beat then!You're showing an extreme bias in your positional defense, sir.
Should be easy to beat then!You're showing an extreme bias in your positional defense, sir.
The position I stated at the outset of the interaction is the stated position of the gun control lobby who wants these types of films banned. All you've given us since then is different arguments about different subjects, which also were pointed out to you to be incorrect or inaccurate analogies. Your rebuttal to that was "Nuh uh!"Should be easy to beat then!
he was known as "the destroyer" in high school. but then he hit the gym, and was known around town as "battleship"Only person you need to talk to about Canadian guns is @Sex Chicken. Heard his nickname is Battleship because his guns are so big.
Nuh uh x 10The position I stated at the outset of the interaction is the stated position of the gun control lobby who wants these types of films banned. All you've given us since then is different arguments about different subjects, which also were pointed out to you to be incorrect or inaccurate analogies. Your rebuttal to that was "Nuh uh!"
It occurs to me it is beat, you're just dragging you're feet about admitting it.
being anti-gun in terms of being against gunshow loophole, being for universal background checks, etc... doesnt negate someone from being a fan of westernsNuh uh x 10
Your starting position was "If he was really anti-gun he wouldn't make his money using them..."
We never argued about a lobby that wants anything.
My argument is nothing else than let actors play whatever roles they want regardless of their personal opinions. Pretty simple really and not beat at all.
Maybe it helps that I don't know shit about the guy and what he does in his free time. Luckily that does not matter at all in my argument.
just because there are 4 of them and they relate to firearms doesn't make them The 4 Rules. They dropped "know your target and what's beyond it" because they're Marines in combat and they DGAF. You will.the one i posted is from Marine Corps marksmanship manual
And you haven't disproven that initial statement. His actions dont align with the anti-gun agenda. Therefore he's not anti-gun.Nuh uh x 10
Your starting position was "If he was really anti-gun he wouldn't make his money using them..."
We never argued about a lobby that wants anything.
My argument is nothing else than let actors play whatever roles they want regardless of their personal opinions. Pretty simple really and not beat at all.
Maybe it helps that I don't know shit about the guy and what he does in his free time. Luckily that does not matter at all in my argument.
uh huh x 5I really like nuh uh x 10, gonna have to use that irl
It's just a nonsensical statement bruv.And you haven't disproven that initial statement. His actions dont align with the anti-gun agenda. Therefore he's not anti-gun.
Set up. The disgruntled camera crew knew the scene plan for the day, and knew who was going to be rehearsing what scene with what weapon.The shooting took place after six members of the film's crew walked off the set after complaining to the production company about payment and housing, camera operator Reid Russell told Det. Joel Cano....
(assistant director) Halls had taken one of three prop guns set up by Gutierrez Reed on a cart left outside the structure because of COVID-19 restrictions, the affidavit said.
that's true, but I don't think you can advocate for a cause while profiting from the suffering you create with it and still be an ethical human.He can play whatever he want without it having to align with anything he believes in personally.
No, he actually can't. Much the same you can't be an environmentalist and then dump toxic waste into the ocean for a living.It's just a nonsensical statement bruv.
He can play whatever he want without it having to align with anything he believes in personally.
on a movie set, you have to point the weapon at the target. its part of the filmgood on you for checking
View attachment 50559
you literally have to break all 4 rules to have an accidental discharge
if I was in charge of gun sale, I'd make it so that no one can buy a gun unless you can recite the safety rules verbatim
No, he actually can't. Much the same you can't be an environmentalist and then dump toxic waste into the ocean for a living.
Ouch. Bad analogies and weird conclusions.that's true, but I don't think you can advocate for a cause while profiting from the suffering you create with it and still be an ethical human.
Is that a common occurrence?the next devout Christian actor that plays an atheist on screen.
HE AIN'T A REAL BELIEVER EVERYONE!
the Christian actor isn't profiting from the causing the 'harm' of atheism, nor is the Christian actor giving money and publicity to banning atheism.Ouch. Bad analogies and weird conclusions.
I feel ya two lost sense of reality for a bit.
I eagerly await the thread where you two trash the personal conviction of the next devout Christian actor that plays an atheist on screen.
HE AIN'T A REAL BELIEVER EVERYONE!
In a climate of people complaining about constant Hollywood wokeness & propaganda, this stance of not enough propaganda in his body of work is an interesting take to say the least.
Why wouldn't it be?Is that a common occurrence?
Huh? Why isn't he making money on that role?the Christian actor isn't profiting from the causing the 'harm' of atheism, nor is the Christian actor giving money and publicity to banning atheism.
It's your analogy, nor mine.Why wouldn't it be?
That's not at all how Christianity works. Christianity also isn't a unified, static entity.Huh? Why isn't he making money on that role?
And he ain't giving money to the church that literally tries to make atheism go away?
he's making money on the role, he's not profiting on the harm that "atheism" causes.Why wouldn't it be?
Huh? Why isn't he making money on that role?
And he ain't giving money to the church that literally tries to make atheism go away?
Derphe's making money on the role, he's not profiting on the harm that "atheism" causes.
Alec Baldwin is out front saying that guns and the glorification of gun violence CAUSES gun violence and death.
EDIT
Also, big difference between giving money to a church to convince people to join you and giving money to the government to force people to join you.
Alec is doing the latter.