Would you be able to come up with a friend or work colleague who has known you for more than 2 years and who can get a visit from a police officer for a short interview, and tell him that you're of sound mind and good character and he's happy to vouch for you?yes. now tell me who's going to administer the interview and what the interview will consist of...
Yes, of course you can.
That puts you one up on Cho, and Lanza and Holmes and Ramos. None of them had a chance of clearing that bar.
He didn't get her to buy him anything, she turned the house into an armoury full of unsecured weapons all by herself. If he hadn't killed her as well, then I would have been fine with her facing charges of negligent homicide - that would never have happened, but that's the level of carelessness and selfishness that she had.point is, even the Sandy Hook killer was able to get his Mom to buy him a gun.
That is not true. Read up on the VTech killer, and exactly how mentally defective and socially isolated he was. Then come back and explain exactly how he gets two Glocks if the law doesn't just let him buy them online.Your safeguard will cost of lot of money and stop no one with even the slightest bit of motivation.
"Current restrictions on firearm ownership."or from one of the millions of criminals who have them despite the current restrictions on firearm ownership.
Who do you think these people are, exactly? What kind of connections do you think they have, what kind of social skills do you think they have, what kind of criminal experience do you think they have?Probably easier to steal from criminals because they don't report the firearm theft.
Do you seriously see Adam Lanza or Seung-Hui Cho burglarising a local drug dealer's house to steal a Glock or an AR-15?
Surprise surprise, turns out that the solution for reducing gun crime, is more people having more guns.Probably the solution is to restore firearm rights to all persons who don't have histories of violent crime.
Just like the solution to the disappearing middle class is to keep doubling down on tax cuts for 1%ers, right? Giving more and more of the pie to the 1% means that eventually everybody eats better, just like flooding the country with even more guns means that guns and gun crime and the threat of gun crime become less of a feature in everyday life. ?
??