Here's my take on it. Is it a thing? Yea probably.
Could I give a fuck? Hell no.
I'll be long gone before it counts, so fuck it.
Could I give a fuck? Hell no.
I'll be long gone before it counts, so fuck it.
yes, it's called Eat The Rich.You got a solution that will have a meaningful effect on climate change that also doesn't plunge large swaths of the planet into abject poverty and starvation?
I've been reading about ancient dinosaurs and dinomorphs.Here's my take on it. Is it a thing? Yea probably.
Could I give a fuck? Hell no.
I'll be long gone before it counts, so fuck it.
It's not the same channel but ya, it seems 'muricans need to be educated about charts and graphs, badly.
did those 1% steal those resources from people?yes, it's called Eat The Rich.
there's ample resources for all the humans on this planet if there wasn't 1% of the population trying to out-possess everyone else.
yes. They inherited a system built to do precisely that.did those 1% steal those resources from people?
sounds like by 1% you mean the government stole if so then yes I agree.yes. They inherited a system built to do precisely that.
Remember when Trump and Biden printed $9T in the course of a year?
that was the 1% stealing everything everyone is going to earn for the next 15 years.
the government is subservient to the 1%.sounds like by 1% you mean the government stole if so then yes I agree.
However I do not and will not support stupid ass violent french revolution guillotine ideological slogans like eat/kill the rich.
Even with our top 1% getting richer and richer over the last 50 years poverty all over the glob has decreased by incredible amounts. We've become incredibly efficient at farming.
you do realize that very few of the people and families who were 1% at the time of Wilson still hold any real power. Google, Apple, Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, Tesla etc etc are all relatively new companies unthought of at the time. Shit Kanye, Oprah, Jordan, Lebron, Dana White and more all new billionaires. That is more upward mobility than any nation in the history of the world has ever seen.the government is subservient to the 1%.
the wealth and purchasing power of the 1% has grown exponentially since Wilson, the working and middle class have remained flat. That's because a central bank prints money and gives it to the 1% to loan out.
just because technology has managed to keep up doesn't mean the system is working for us.
I can agree with a lot of this though as well. Covid lockdowns were a huge wealth theft from the lower and middle classes. But i don't blame bezos. I blame Pelosi, Fauci, etcthe government is subservient to the 1%.
the wealth and purchasing power of the 1% has grown exponentially since Wilson, the working and middle class have remained flat. That's because a central bank prints money and gives it to the 1% to loan out.
just because technology has managed to keep up doesn't mean the system is working for us.
the solution isn't to take anything from anyone.you do realize that very few of the people and families who were 1% at the time of Wilson still hold any real power. Google, Apple, Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, Tesla etc etc are all relatively new companies unthought of at the time. Shit Kanye, Oprah, Jordan, Lebron, Dana White and more all new billionaires. That is more upward mobility than any nation in the history of the world has ever seen.
Yes our central banking is fucked and is printing gajillions of $$ that will one day come home to roost. Fucking the middle and lower classes for sure. But the answer to that isn't hey lets go eat Bezos. Or take things from him that literally millions of people (including myself and probably you too) have willingly given him.
... or, warnings about the inevitable that people will ignore until it's too late.I love the smell of fear porn in the morning
i think when millions of people decide to give other people the fruit of their own labor in legal ways that is between those two parties and has fuck all to do with you or i. So yes Lebron and Dana getting that much money is A ok by me. I've never given any to Lebron but i've shelled out for more than my fair share of UFC events over the years and I know I ain't the only one.the solution isn't to take anything from anyone.
"One Day" is literally today.
You think that Dana White and Lebron are examples of the system working? a guy who can throw a ball in a little hoop and a guy who pays people to try and kill each other? Throw Bob Guiccione on that list.
how rich is Ingo Potrykus? How about Satoshi Omura? but serial sex offenders can sign $50M/yr salaries because they throw ball far. throw ball good. run ball fast.
Kanye and Oprah? why not throw in The Kardashians as an example of the how cronyism works for everyone.
Btw, if I use curse words or name call, I’m in a playful mood. That means I am relaxed.Relax, go take a nap
And for my part, sometimes my posts reflect my early onset dementia, so never take much of anything I say seriouslyBtw, if I use curse words or name call, I’m in a playful mood. That means I am relaxed.
right, there's nothing unethical about it in it's "pure" form. But it's also a system that rewards the businesses that are best at playing to base instincts. And it's also a system that has several tiers of citizenship, because the legal system that's available to R.Kelly isn't available to you and me.i think when millions of people decide to give other people the fruit of their own labor in legal ways that is between those two parties and has fuck all to do with you or i. So yes Lebron and Dana getting that much money is A ok by me. I've never given any to Lebron but i've shelled out for more than my fair share of UFC events over the years and I know I ain't the only one.
idk if i call freedom to decide where, when, and how to spend your $ a system. The richest people in our society are those who bring a product that has been purchased by the most people. Thats a good thing. I should own and be able to choose how to spend the fruit of my labor as i see fit.But it's also a system that rewards the businesses that are best at playing to base instincts.
this is just plain untrue. the worst off in our society both have and have access to far far more than they did even just decades ago. Yes that's is in large part due to technology but we don't get technology without both massive wealth concentration and then investment. Not to mention access to all the social safety net spending in our society.and it's a system that is designed to get worse for the worst off and better for the best off.
that's not how the system works, that's how the system is marketed.The richest people in our society are those who bring a product that has been purchased by the most people.
yes, but that's in spite of the system not because of it. And it's not accounting for the opportunity cost of so much wealth being centralized with so few investors.the worst off in our society both have and have access to far far more than they did even just decades ago.
Musk, Bezos, Gates, and Zuck are the 4 richest people in the us right now. Which of them have not created a product being used by literal millions if not billions of people???that's not how the system works, that's how the system is marketed.
which of them started from outside the 1%?Musk, Bezos, Gates, and Zuck are the 4 richest people in the us right now. Which of them have not created a product being used by literal millions if not billions of people???
which of them started from outside the 1%?
Bezos & Zuck.which of them started from outside the 1%?