I like feeling something, missing my ex now.Sad thread but this song though.
View: https://youtu.be/Ginx7WKq5GE
Enhanced my pain... What a fucking waste.
I like feeling something, missing my ex now.Sad thread but this song though.
View: https://youtu.be/Ginx7WKq5GE
Enhanced my pain... What a fucking waste.
According to reports, he was bullied by Turks and Arabs. Among the victims, 3 are Turks, 3 are Arabs, 1 is a Greek muslim (from the area of Thrace where a lot of muslims live).He was born in Germany, he was german. He was bullied at school so it's the Germans fault, so it's his own fault?
Hey bro if I post 6 videos of Muslims doing great things im Germany would that change anything?Don't necessarily agree with the title or the message in the end, posting it only for the event shown:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D24bK9mqKo4
I knew this was coming and wanted to pre-emptively address it but am glad to have waited. You are right, it shouldn't be Mehmet and Amira's problem but that still, it doesn't logically shift the responsibility onto Joe and Sharon. Two wrongs don't make a right.I understand that point but if we expand it further, why should it be Mehmet and Amira's problem if they didn't have anything to do with the decisions that lead to the conflict?
The UK government is democratically elected, so we have a level of responsibility.
Here in Vancouver we like to say 'two Wongs don't make a white'.I knew this was coming and wanted to pre-emptively address it but am glad to have waited. You are right, it shouldn't be Mehmet and Amira's problem but that still, it doesn't logically shift the responsibility onto Joe and Sharon. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Joe and Sharon shouldn't now be forced to adapt to life with Mehmet and Amira unless they agree to do so. The people are not peons who must accept everything the government decides; at some point there must be pushback.
Here's an example:
zing!Here in Vancouver we like to say 'two Wongs don't make a white'.
I knew this was coming and wanted to pre-emptively address it but am glad to have waited. You are right, it shouldn't be Mehmet and Amira's problem but that still, it doesn't logically shift the responsibility onto Joe and Sharon. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Joe and Sharon shouldn't now be forced to adapt to life with Mehmet and Amira unless they agree to do so. The people are not peons who must accept everything the government decides; at some point there must be pushback.
Here's an example:
If you accept 100 guests, and 50 of them are doing nice things but the other fifty commit horrible crimes like rape, bullying and murder, there are only two logical solutions:Hey bro if I post 6 videos of Muslims doing great things im Germany would that change anything?
You're not wrong. I think this is something that comes down to perspective. Should we help people less fortunate, especially when our government is responsible for it? I would say yes but understand people who disagree. I didn't cause it, it's not my fault, why should I have to deal with the fall out? I get that.I knew this was coming and wanted to pre-emptively address it but am glad to have waited. You are right, it shouldn't be Mehmet and Amira's problem but that still, it doesn't logically shift the responsibility onto Joe and Sharon. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Joe and Sharon shouldn't now be forced to adapt to life with Mehmet and Amira unless they agree to do so. The people are not peons who must accept everything the government decides; at some point there must be pushback.
Here's an example:
Make a point please and don't expect me to know what you're thinking.Something something democratically elected governments something something 1951 Refugee Contention something something 1961 Protocol regarding the status of refugees
Where did you get that number from?If you accept 100 guests, and 50 of them are doing nice things but the other fifty commit horrible crimes like rape, bullying and murder, there are only two logical solutions:
1) Either receive only the 50 benevolent guests
or
2) Receive none of them.
An EXCELLENT point and question. And the only answer is "Yes." But the two questions everyone must honestly ask and answer are:Should we help people less fortunate, especially when our government is responsible for it?
There are conditions in the middle east that render a varying sections of the populace eligible for refugee status, signatories must receive those refugees if said refugees request it and are deemed to be genuine refugees.Make a point please and don't expect me to know what you're thinking.
You people and your numbers, I am just bringing an example, the same goes if 20 of them commit crimes and 80 of them are doing "nice things".Where did you get that number from?
Youre not possibly claiming that 50% or a number in that ballpark of refugees are rapists, bullies or murderers surely.
If this is ever dealt with, I fervently hope that those responsible ie the political class bear the brunt of the response, whatever that may be. Not the immigrants. People need to redirect their anger.You're not wrong. I think this is something that comes down to perspective. Should we help people less fortunate, especially when our government is responsible for it? I would say yes but understand people who disagree. I didn't cause it, it's not my fault, why should I have to deal with the fall out? I get that.
Yes, that we turned their very ancient civilization into smoldering radioactive rubble cannot be disentangled.There are conditions in the middle east that render a varying sections of the populace eligible for refugee status, signatories must receive those refugees if said refugees request it and are deemed to be genuine refugees.
That last part is the clincher, refugee families, women and children in my experience intergrate well into their new home, fathers of those families are some of the best contributors, single male refugees tend to the the issue where im from and I have a LOT of experience with them IE used to teach English to the kids, help the ones who could speak english fill out forms etc
Well the events which inspired this thread don't really follow that narrative, now do they?That last part is the clincher, refugee families, women and children in my experience intergrate well into their new home,
If national sovereignty means anything in this day and age you should be. That's being hotly contested right now by the globalists, as you know.Well the events which inspired this thread don't really follow that narrative, now do they?
Things change and people should be free to change laws and not accept something which isn't working for them.
Don't fall into the trap of thinking that because I'm against this massive level of immigration that I'm anti-immigration. (Edit) What I'm saying is if it's causing a problem and the citizens of a country don't want them then they should be free to say no.