Do u think Kimbo/Shamrock was a work?

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

Was it a work?

  • Yes

    Votes: 17 34.7%
  • No

    Votes: 22 44.9%
  • TQN is a douchebag

    Votes: 2 4.1%
  • On the fence/skeptical

    Votes: 8 16.3%

  • Total voters
    49

La Paix

Fuck this place
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
38,273
64,364
Fair enough, I couldn't remember what has actually been said or verified about that. For some reason I thought Del Rio had come out and said it was, but I must be misremembering.
Don't trust me on this one as I'm extremely biased when it comes to Cro Cop.
 

ChaosOverkill

Quod severis metes
First 100
Jan 16, 2015
6,248
4,866
Don't trust me on this one as I'm extremely biased when it comes to Cro Cop.

All I really mean to say is never underestimate what people will do for money. For some, punches, kicks, being KO'd is not the dealbreaker for the right price.
 

Robin Black

MMA Analyst
Mar 11, 2015
84
223
Hey guys.

I can't speak in any way to motivation, who/what/why anything might or might not be a work, etc.

I agree with Jimmy (Hi Jimmy!) and others that there's no way in hell that Bellator or Scott Coker would ever fix a fight. But other that that I have no thoughts to offer on the likelihood or motivation behind any possible fix or anything like that.

What I can speak to is the viz that I have watched and rewatched and analyzed.

I watch and analyze combat sports for a living and have watched and analyzed literally many thousands of hours of fight viz over the last 8 years. I have commentated almost 300 shows for DEEP, The Score Fighting Series, KSW, W-1, CFC, TSOF Canada, and a dozen other shows.

Ramdeen and I currently are re-calling, in English, all of the Classic Pancrase fights from the 90s to today. Including the brilliant one-sided works of Suzuki and Funaki (fights where their opponents were not in on it but the were so superior that they "carried" them to create storylines to sell the next event). We air them as "Vintage Pancrase" on Fight Network in 32 countries.

Here's some analysis:

Ken's single leg- Kimbo fell down without defending. He did not engage any musculature or physicality. Why? Only he knows. Brain fart?

Ken's choke- Ken's back was not engaged and he was using no power. He was not 'muscling' the choke in any way. There was no muscular engagement in his lats, triceps, teres major, infraspinatus or trapezius. We all agree the technique was poorly applied but comments about Ken 'muscling' the choke are incorrect, most of his muscles were not firing. Why? I can't tell you that.

This whole conversation actually makes me a bit uncomfortable and I think I'm just going to move on with my life and keep living in a world where I don't question these things.

I love Mixed Martial Arts so much, it is a sport of beauty and greatness.

Cheers guys.

Robin
 

ThatOneDude

Commander in @Chief, Dick Army
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
35,390
34,114
Hey guys.

I can't speak in any way to motivation, who/what/why anything might or might not be a work, etc.

I agree with Jimmy (Hi Jimmy!) and others that there's no way in hell that Bellator or Scott Coker would ever fix a fight. But other that that I have no thoughts to offer on the likelihood or motivation behind any possible fix or anything like that.

What I can speak to is the viz that I have watched and rewatched and analyzed.

I watch and analyze combat sports for a living and have watched and analyzed literally many thousands of hours of fight viz over the last 8 years. I have commentated almost 300 shows for DEEP, The Score Fighting Series, KSW, W-1, CFC, TSOF Canada, and a dozen other shows.

Ramdeen and I currently are re-calling, in English, all of the Classic Pancrase fights from the 90s to today. Including the brilliant one-sided works of Suzuki and Funaki (fights where their opponents were not in on it but the were so superior that they "carried" them to create storylines to sell the next event). We air them as "Vintage Pancrase" on Fight Network in 32 countries.

Here's some analysis:

Ken's single leg- Kimbo fell down without defending. He did not engage any musculature or physicality. Why? Only he knows. Brain fart?

Ken's choke- Ken's back was not engaged and he was using no power. He was not 'muscling' the choke in any way. There was no muscular engagement in his lats, triceps, teres major, infraspinatus or trapezius. We all agree the technique was poorly applied but comments about Ken 'muscling' the choke are incorrect, most of his muscles were not firing. Why? I can't tell you that.

This whole conversation actually makes me a bit uncomfortable and I think I'm just going to move on with my life and keep living in a world where I don't question these things.

I love Mixed Martial Arts so much, it is a sport of beauty and greatness.

Cheers guys.

Robin
Thanks for the input Robin Black @Robin Black , it is always valued here!

Dun DUN DUNNNNNNNNN


man this whole conversation keeps getting stranger and stranger.
 

Priziesthorse

TMMAC Addict
First 100
Jan 15, 2015
10,612
27,283
Ken's choke- Ken's back was not engaged and he was using no power. He was not 'muscling' the choke in any way. There was no muscular engagement in his lats, triceps, teres major, infraspinatus or trapezius. We all agree the technique was poorly applied but comments about Ken 'muscling' the choke are incorrect, most of his muscles were not firing. Why? I can't tell you that.


WWE sleeper hold imo
 

MMAHAWK

Real Gs come from California.America Muthafucker
Feb 5, 2015
15,230
33,205
Good Question
This is my argument

#1 - 3 out of 4 times in his MMA career attempting an RNC this was his technique. It worked the first 2 times why not the third. So if the choke is the reason for calling it a fix. Than certainly accusing Rutten and Mitchell of throwing fights is not out of the question. If we agree they did than Ken has thrown fights from day one. If they didn't than Ken just has crappy technique that didn't work 20 years after his last attempted RNC.

#2 the clinch
If I am to believe Ken and Kimbo planned to work the fight. Than I must also belive that prior to the cage shutting they only planned out the first 10 seconds. After an immediate takedown by shamrock Kimbo got right back to his feet extremely easily. Then the immediately clinch. To apparently plan the rest of the fight according to people calling out a fix. Never mind risking anyone including one of the most respected people in all MMA BJM hearing them. Perhaps both fighters were just to old to remember a 2 minute script.

#3 takedown #2
I know this is a long shot. Since Kimbo got up from the first takedown with ease. Is it not possible that he thought he could get up again using virtually no energy like the first one. Instead of using likely much more energy fighting off the takedown. Thinking a 51 year old man 30lbs lighter could not keep him down.

#4 Ken not throwing punches

He sunk in an attempted choke about a second after getting kimbo's back. It is not as if he observed the situation for a minute then went for the choke. Am I the only person that has seen this exact same situation unfold 100's of times in other fights? Or every time this has happened is the fighter not throwing punches working the fight?
 

kneeblock

Drapetomaniac
Apr 18, 2015
12,435
22,917
I believe the fix was in between Ken and himself. It was a paycheck fight. A little side action wouldn't have killed anyone.
 

MMAHAWK

Real Gs come from California.America Muthafucker
Feb 5, 2015
15,230
33,205
I believe the fix was in between Ken and himself. It was a paycheck fight. A little side action wouldn't have killed anyone.
I don't understand. You think it was only Ken?
 

OhWhopDaChamp

TMMAC Addict
Apr 20, 2015
6,222
8,796
Was asked to weigh in on this topic, and thought I would give my 2-cents considering I have been hearing a LOT about it.

MMA, unlike boxing, doesn't often work on the "undefeated mega-fight" system where there is a TON of money riding on 2 fighters overcoming certain fights to make the "big one" happen. Most fighters in MMA have records that would make them journeymen in boxing, even some of the biggest names in the sport. MMA doesn't have any title sanctioning bodies like boxing, there are no rival promoters on the opposing sides of 2 fighters, and the national promotions have virtually unlimited discretion in deciding who fights who, when, and for what title. There is no need for a fix to make a certain fight happen, the only thing necessary is the promotion themselves putting the fight together.

That is my general argument against most cries of "fix!!" in the MMA world (like I stated before: from a PROMOTIONAL point of view). Why would Bellator, the UFC, or anyone else take the ASTRONOMICAL risk of fixing a fight when they can make whatever fight they want with a fan base that is fairly forgiving of a loss?

Now, dealing with the specifics of Ken/Kimbo:


The one question I want to ask people who doubt the veracity of the fight is: What kind of fight did you expect?

Ken has built his reputation on his submission skills, but he has always been a guy who generally forced a submission rather than relied on pure technique. If you recall his fight with Don Frye, he wrenched on leg locks several times and wasn't able to get the proper angle to finish the fight. It was a technical issue that dogged much of his career.

What we saw at Bellator 138 was, in my opinion, the best effort of a fighter who didn't have that much left to give.
Those are my honest thoughts, do with them what you will.

Thanks guys, you always great!

Jimmy
All of this. Every single word. I've been just reading this thread on and off, I really can't believe this is a legit debate with McG/Aldo coming up in a few weeks. With an interim title fight between Werdum/Hunt. Mark Hunt? Ok. That's not enough proof that MMA promotions can make whatever fight they choose in spite of fan outrage? Chael freakin Sonnen vs Jon Jones. C'mon. But it's fun to read just for amusement because I honestly don't believe anyone can suspend logic that damn long.
 

WoodenPupa

Member
Feb 14, 2015
2,920
3,564
Ken's choke- Ken's back was not engaged and he was using no power. He was not 'muscling' the choke in any way. There was no muscular engagement in his lats, triceps, teres major, infraspinatus or trapezius. We all agree the technique was poorly applied but comments about Ken 'muscling' the choke are incorrect, most of his muscles were not firing. Why? I can't tell you that.
QED. So much WTF in the choke sequence.
 

Darqnezz

Merkin' fools since pre-school
Apr 25, 2015
4,653
7,211


WWE sleeper hold imo
If you look at Ken's right arm, for a correctly applied RNC the elbow should line up with Kimbo's chin. Because its not lined up correctly it wouldnt properly cut of blood supply to the brain. The forearm digging into the throat isnt fun, but if you've felt it a few times you can definately deal with the pain. With this arm placement everytime your opponent moves it frees up just enough oxygen to keep them from going out.
 

WoodenPupa

Member
Feb 14, 2015
2,920
3,564
I'm trying to recall Fedor's choke on Sylvia now, just because that was an air choke. Didn't he primarily use his forearm in that one? I remember being kind of astonished at how effective it was. Tim was also very dazed from punches though.
 

Kinosis

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2015
483
596
At first I was leaning towards it being a legit fight, mostly because of the big shot Ken took at the end, but after looking at Ken's career, he has at least 2 other fights that looked fishy (I haven't seen every fight he has ever had). 1. Matt Hume, that fight looked like a work for sure which leads to #2 Rich Franklin. Franklin was trained by Matt Hume so make of that what you will.

I can't say 100% that this was a work, it could just be 2 guys who aren't very good anymore, but Ken has a fishy history. I don't think Bellator knew anything about it if it was a work, just Ken taking a dive.
 

WoodenPupa

Member
Feb 14, 2015
2,920
3,564
Meh. At 8:00 or so Luke starts talking about Ken "driving the hips in" during the choke sequence and that's where I don't follow him. All this business about Ken trying to "brute muscle" the technique and all that is irrelevant if Ken isn't using his hips, back, traps and everything else to help out. In order to muscle a technique you have to actually use muscle. Again, from Robin's post:

Ken's choke- Ken's back was not engaged and he was using no power. He was not 'muscling' the choke in any way. There was no muscular engagement in his lats, triceps, teres major, infraspinatus or trapezius. We all agree the technique was poorly applied but comments about Ken 'muscling' the choke are incorrect, most of his muscles were not firing. Why? I can't tell you that.
 

sparkuri

Pulse on the finger of The Cimmunity
First 100
Jan 16, 2015
37,844
49,757
I'm trying to recall Fedor's choke on Sylvia now, just because that was an air choke. Didn't he primarily use his forearm in that one? I remember being kind of astonished at how effective it was. Tim was also very dazed from punches though.
Yes, it was all hand.

A good one that shows how easy this should be is Fedor demonstrating a rnc on SportsScience. (anaconda/python/boa episode)

As darqness pointed out, the elbow is not aligned with the chin, the crutch is not under the throat.
Even if this had been positioned initially, the proper form could've been transitioned to in fractions of a second.