From June 2021, six months into the year
The United States has yet to see a lightning fatality this year, a record to date
The United States has yet to see a lightning fatality this year, a record to date
Assault weapons ban (with associated restriction on 10+ magazines as was done last time) would probably reduce mass shooting injuries and deaths per shooting.
I'd be in favor of increased age and background checking for these items instead of banning them. But banning them will eventually make them less available via cost increases....10-15 years from now.
Suicides are probably impacted by waiting periods.
Domestic abuse turned homicides the same.
Gang violence will require handgun management and of course all the other interventions associated with economic disparities.
that's not how statistical probability works...From June 2021, six months into the year
The United States has yet to see a lightning fatality this year, a record to date
Are you working with the probability of a child getting struck by lightning?that's not how statistical probability works...
omg ban lightning!!Lightening deaths in the US 2020: 17
Gun related deaths in the US 2020 excluding suicide: ~20.930
Is this "simping"? It seems like simping.[QUOTE
lol
what you gonna do, shoot him pussy?
lol, no it’s me making fun of @Filthy and calling him a pussy!Is this "simping"? It seems like simping.
It was an honest question. I don't use Reddit so I'm not familiar with these terms you're fishing out of the fringe depths.lol, no it’s me making fun of @Filthy and calling him a pussy!
i only simp for israel!!It was an honest question. I don't use Reddit so I'm not familiar with these terms you're fishing out of the fringe depths.
because a well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the people's ability to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
A well regulated militia.. how is the defined?because a well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the people's ability to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
If you're at the controls of the largest mass-killing machine in the history of humanity, you don't get to ask why other humans have the right to less frequent magazine changes.
"Hundreds of bullets in minutes"because a well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the people's ability to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
If you're at the controls of the largest mass-killing machine in the history of humanity, you don't get to ask why other humans have the right to less frequent magazine changes.
Switzerland is a good model.A well regulated militia.. how is the defined?
What is the point of this post?"Hundreds of bullets in minutes"
What is the point of this post?
These weapons don't fire hundreds of rounds in minutes?
Mass killers haven't fired hundreds of rounds during their short-lived rampages?
No, the point of this post is that Joe Biden said something about gun control. And therefore you feel compelled to reflexively dismiss and mock whatever he said no matter what, because he's a Dem.
Exactly as every single other right wing shill does.
That sort of mindless shit, day in and day out, repeated in exactly the same way for every single political wedge issue, is exactly what makes you a shill. ?
??
Switzerland is a good model.
@Filthy remember when I recommended that we should have increased training and permitting as you go up up the classes of firearms and you referenced Mexico and muh dozers...
Switzerland has a stunningly high rate of gun ownership — here's why it doesn't have mass shootings
Here's what the US can learn from Switzerland, which has nearly eliminated mass shootings while maintaining a high rate of gun ownership.www.businessinsider.com
Even the NRA points at Switzerland, like you did, As an example of high gun ownership, low crime. And yet when looking at the details here we are again. Increase training. increase permitting. Psychological evaluation even for certain permits. Tons of guns. Safe use. We should do the same.
First, of all, I think the article you are quoting used the numbers of a person, any person not just children getting struck by lightning vs getting shot in a school (which of course is mostly children).a student is twice as likely to be struck by lightning as they are to be present during a mass shooting event.