General COVID Darwin Awards
- Thread starter Wintermute
- Start date
I sure we have a few on here with less than a 70 IQ..
New study indicates conspiracy theory believers have less developed critical thinking abilities
New study indicates conspiracy theory believers have less developed critical thinking abilities
New research published in Applied Cognitive Psychology provides evidence that critical thinking skills are negatively related to belief in conspiracy ...www.psypost.org
you didn't read the actual studies, or the methodology, did you?
you love your confirmation bias almost as much as
@Blood Moon loves his.you guys should be best friends
He won't return my lettersyou love your confirmation bias almost as much as
you guys should be best friends
Give me your definition of safe and effective first.
Safe would mean less than what percent die or have serious injury from the vaccine?
And 'effective' are you referring to keeps you from getting Covid or not getting the Rona at all?
You were right about a previous infection giving better immunity than the vaccine alone.
Can we just end the thread here?
It's proven that you're all idiots whether or not you're vaxxed.
It's proven that you're all idiots whether or not you're vaxxed.
to which demographic?
Effective also includes "cost effective". And we're not talking about vaccinations against previous variants in the elderly or people with co-morbities. We're talking about vaccine mandates of otherwise young and healthy people.@Filthy , my source will be numbers hospitals are putting out there of number of unvaccinated vs vaccinated on effectiveness.
And the numbers reported to VAERS vs the number of people vaccinated with no reported side effects.
Is the vaccine 100% safe and effective? Hell no, nothing is.
Early Omicron Breakthroughs Show MRNA Vaccines’ Weakness
Booster shots with mRNA vaccines such as Pfizer and BioNTech failed to block omicron, a study revealed.
What difference does that make?
Your original question was 'is the vaccine safe and effective '? Now it's 'but not earlier vaccines' and 'not the elderly and people with co-morbities'.Effective also includes "cost effective". And we're not talking about vaccinations against previous variants in the elderly or people with co-morbities. We're talking about vaccine mandates of otherwise young and healthy people.
Early Omicron Breakthroughs Show MRNA Vaccines’ Weakness
Booster shots with mRNA vaccines such as Pfizer and BioNTech failed to block omicron, a study revealed.www.bloombergquint.com
Either just go ahead and state your opinions or ask a more specific question. That would be a more safe and effective way of communication.
are the risks of negative outcomes from COVID the same irrespective of demographic?
i thought omicron still impacted elderly and those in poor health more than the young and healthy.
i actually mentioned that I was talking about the dominant variant, which AFAIK is omicron.
and I'm just clarifying that by effective, i mean effective for society, not just people who are already at high risk of negative health consequences.
EDIT:
this whole thing started with a "moderator" (if I might be allowed to continue to abuse the definition of that word) posting a retarded meme about an otherwise healthy person intentionally exposing themselves to SARS-COV2 because of vaccine/inoculation mandate
Are you talking about COVID that can develop from having Sars-cov-2?
If so,then yes. The negative outcomes of COVID still outweigh the negative outcomes from the vaccine in every demographic.
you're not including the negative social outcomes...like paying Pfizer >$100B/yr and allowing the FedGov to mandate personal health decisions.
And you're not comparing the vaccine effectiveness to the effectiveness of all demographics having access to NPIs and contact-tracing.
It's a custom-made dilemma for mRNA vaccines and no producer liability.
By all means, raise your concerns about my moderating to the relevant people.