It's coming back, sad days are upon us.Who the fuck has 'carpet' anymore these days...
It's coming back, sad days are upon us.Who the fuck has 'carpet' anymore these days...
*sigh*
I admire your ambition, I really do. Ok, let's do this.
Where did I say there wasn't an agenda?
Are you trying to say there's a gay agenda but this isn't an example of it or that there's no gay agenda full stop?Having a gay character isn't necessarily pushing a gay agenda.
Good post except I don't think gays/lesbians decide if they are homosexual. I could've read what you posted wrong but that's what I got out of it. I don't remember deciding that I liked boobies, vag, and girl ass at any time. My penis whispered it in my ear as a child and I went with it.It isn't like they're going to show her doing anything graphic with her partner, it is a disney movie.
Why shouldn't gay people be in kids movies? They're around us everyday and your kid could very well decide that he/she is gay when the time comes. What do gay people do so wrong that we need to protect our children from knowing they exist?
I don't think they decide either, but he/she might not necessarily know it yet so I wasn't exactly sure how to phrase it.Good post except I don't think gays/lesbians decide if they are homosexual. I could've read what you posted wrong but that's what I got out of it. I don't remember deciding that I liked boobies, vag, and girl ass at any time. My penis whispered it in my ear as a child and I went with it.
I understand.I don't think they decide either, but he/she might not necessarily know it yet so I wasn't exactly sure how to phrase it.
I would have gone with 'Licks pussy', but being fairly new here I don't have a good enough feel to the levels of moderation that are enacted. So, I played it safe. Everyone know Elsa is smoother than a veal cutlet down there.Who the fuck has 'carpet' anymore these days...
I don't think exposing little children to sexuality at all is a good thing, but I agree that there should be no harm in portraying a lesbian couple, seeing as couples are indeed portrayed, but why does it have to be "considered" ? either do it or don't.It isn't like they're going to show her doing anything graphic with her partner, it is a disney movie.
Why shouldn't gay people be in kids movies? They're around us everyday and your kid could very well decide that he/she is gay when the time comes. What do gay people do so wrong that we need to protect our children from knowing they exist?
Your reading comprehension is quite poor. You continually invent a stance for me that I haven't taken. I shall, however, clarify further:Are you trying to say there's a gay agenda but this isn't an example of it or that there's no gay agenda full stop?
Most people have pointed out making a point of sexualing a character in child's animated movie seems unnecessary and rather agenda-like. We could look at a lot of weird shit they put in kids' films and media that doesn't belong but if we're looking at this then how isn't this a part of an agenda (a gay one)? "....not that there's anything wrong with that." -Seinfeld
I'm not sure why you take any questioning of your ideas or words as some kind of affront but that's up to you to figure out.
Why be so snotty about your opinion?Your reading comprehension is quite poor.
As far as I can read from my posts, I have asked you a couple questions and that's about it. But what stance have I invented for you?You continually invent a stance for me that I haven't taken.
I would agree with you except that it isn't the norm to make a point of highlighting a cartoon character is homosexual when the target audience is little children. That seems like an agenda to me. A heterosexual agenda? I can see what comparison you are trying to make but I think things change when the biological need to procreate has already decided things...Including a gay character in a movie is not an indicator of that, anymore than including a heterosexual character is indicative of a heterosexual agenda.
Because this isn't the first (or second) time you've done this. I'm getting a bit sick of you misrepresenting my posts.Why be so snotty about your opinion?
"But you're sure there ISN'T one?" - where did that even come from? I never said or even suggested that.As far as I can read from my posts, I have asked you a couple questions and that's about it. But what stance have I invented for you?
It seems like an agenda to you to include real life demographics? I think it's YOU who needs to lighten up.I would agree with you except that it isn't the norm to make a point of highlighting a cartoon character is homosexual when the target audience is little children. That seems like an agenda to me. A heterosexual agenda? I can see what comparison you are trying to make but I think things change when the biological need to procreate has already decided things...
Anyhow, have a cup of sunshine and try to lighten up.
My advice would be to keep at him and get him to put you on ignore. This place is a lot more fun without him policing all your posts lolWhy be so snotty about your opinion?
It has to be considered because of reactions like this online. It has to be considered because of the ridiculous reaction to Target's new policy. Do they want angry christian parents storming into theaters screaming, "Else was a CARPET MUNCHER, JESUS DIDN'T ASSOCIATE WITH CARPET MUNCHERS!"I don't think exposing little children to sexuality at all is a good thing, but I agree that there should be no harm in portraying a lesbian couple, seeing as couples are indeed portrayed, but why does it have to be "considered" ? either do it or don't.
they've created a topic of discussion that will reach every country in the world. was it worth it?
I thought it was supposed to be an enjoyable movie for all ages not a social commentary only adults and young adults will understand.
Let's go bud, me and you, mano a mano.I smell TMMAC Fight Night 3
so ... token trans?I'm not surprised motherfuckers.
Gay and trans is all the rage now. I like the idea of having homosexual characters in media, but it really seems ham-handed the way they're throwing in it now a days.
But that's, like, just my opinion.
hell no, I like my shit pushed out.Let's go bud, me and you, mano a mano.
Edit: It took me five minutes of googling to figure out how to spell mano a mano and it wasn't worth it.
I'll file that in the "Never Question Supreme Purveyor of Justice, Leigh" bin. I haven't misrepresented your posts and asked about 2 or 3 simple questions. Why that has you in a fit is something I find odd.Because this isn't the first (or second) time you've done this. I'm getting a bit sick of you misrepresenting my posts.
I wasn't suggesting you did say that. I used a question mark, that denotes a question, I was clarifying this statement:"But you're sure there ISN'T one?" - where did that even come from? I never said or even suggested that.
So what stance have I invented for you? You've accused me of doing this, I have asked you to provide an example.Having a gay character isn't necessarily pushing a gay agenda.
Anyhow, take it easy.It seems like an agenda to you to include real life demographics?
Duly notedMy advice would be to keep at him and get him to put you on ignore. This place is a lot more fun without him policing all your posts lol
So you completely agree with me?I'll file that in the "Never Question Supreme Purveyor of Justice, Leigh" bin. I haven't misrepresented your posts and asked about 2 or 3 simple questions. Why that has you in a fit is something I find odd.
I wasn't suggesting you did say that. I used a question mark, that denotes a question, I was clarifying this statement:
So what stance have I invented for you? You've accused me of doing this, I have asked you to provide an example.
I'm not even sure you know what you're trying to say with this one:
Anyhow, take it easy.