General Russia Ukraine round 2 Price hike boogaloo

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
people still believe Russia-gate?
Did jimmy dore tell you nothing was going on??

1000+ pages of bipartisan reports detailing Russia coordinated infiltration of the GOP and other orgs such as the NRA to alter the United States election...


 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
The Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee submitted the first part of its five-volume report in July 2019 in which it concluded that the January 2017 intelligence community assessment alleging Russian interference was "coherent and well-constructed". The first volume also concluded that the assessment was "proper", learning from analysts that there was "no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions". The final and fifth volume, which was the result of three years of investigations, was released on August 18, 2020,[6] ending one of the United States "highest-profile congressional inquiries."[7][8] The Committee report found that the Russian government had engaged in an "extensive campaign" to sabotage the election in favor of Donald Trump, which included assistance from some members of Trump's own advisers.[7]

Like the Mueller report that preceded it, the report does not find a criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign, but it does go further than the Mueller report in detailing the ties found between Trump campaign members and Russian individuals. Most importantly, it specifically says (on p. 948) that Trump and his associates participated in and enabled the Russian assault on the U.S. electoral process:

It is our conclusion, based on the facts detailed in the Committee's Report, that the Russian intelligence services' assault on the integrity of the 2016 U.S. electoral process[,] and Trump and his associates' participation in and enabling of this Russian activity, represents one of the single most grave counterintelligence threats to American national security in the modern era.

In particular, it describes Paul Manafort as "a grave counterintelligence threat" to the Trump campaign. According to the report, "some evidence suggests" that Konstantin Kilimnik, to whom Manafort provided polling data, was directly connected to the Russian theft of Clinton-campaign emails.[9][10] In addition, while Trump's written testimony in the Mueller report stated that he did not recall speaking with Roger Stone about WikiLeaks, the Senate report concludes that "Trump did, in fact, speak with Stone about WikiLeaks and with members of his Campaign about Stone's access to WikiLeaks on multiple occasions".[11]
 

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,507
29,641
Did jimmy dore tell you nothing was going on??

1000+ pages of bipartisan reports detailing Russia coordinated infiltration of the GOP and other orgs such as the NRA to alter the United States election...


this the same report that said Russia stole Hillary's emails?

Did Don Lemon tell you that?
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
this the same report that said Russia stole Hillary's emails?

Did Don Lemon tell you that?

I don't watch cable news.
Could you tell me where the republican lead bipartisan report is wrong and then cite your sources?
I'm happy to read them. I just don't think there's something not credible about that report.
 

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,507
29,641

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
60,704
56,214
I don't watch cable news.
Could you tell me where the republican lead bipartisan report is wrong and then cite your sources?
I'm happy to read them. I just don't think there's something not credible about that report.
I think you're both talking past each other. You both looked at the same meme and interpreted it differently.

For some context, here's the Guardian still going with "Trump is a Russian asset" in January of 2021: ‘The perfect target’: Russia cultivated Trump as asset for 40 years – ex-KGB spy
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest

What exactly do you want me to read there?
Jumping straight to the section on email Hacking goes even further into the specific excitement including overt attempts to participate in advance notice and leaking of emails by the Trump campaign. It attributes hacking the emails to the Russians and continued coordination of those leaks despite recognizing that by the campaign.

this the same report that said Russia stole Hillary's emails?
I'm not reading an entire page reiterating what I already have read to try to find the one thing you think counters. Your link mentions Russia stealing emails. How does that go along with your rhetorical question here?