people still believe Russia-gate?
Did jimmy dore tell you nothing was going on??people still believe Russia-gate?
The Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee submitted the first part of its five-volume report in July 2019 in which it concluded that the January 2017 intelligence community assessment alleging Russian interference was "coherent and well-constructed". The first volume also concluded that the assessment was "proper", learning from analysts that there was "no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions". The final and fifth volume, which was the result of three years of investigations, was released on August 18, 2020,[6] ending one of the United States "highest-profile congressional inquiries."[7][8] The Committee report found that the Russian government had engaged in an "extensive campaign" to sabotage the election in favor of Donald Trump, which included assistance from some members of Trump's own advisers.[7]
Like the Mueller report that preceded it, the report does not find a criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign, but it does go further than the Mueller report in detailing the ties found between Trump campaign members and Russian individuals. Most importantly, it specifically says (on p. 948) that Trump and his associates participated in and enabled the Russian assault on the U.S. electoral process:
It is our conclusion, based on the facts detailed in the Committee's Report, that the Russian intelligence services' assault on the integrity of the 2016 U.S. electoral process[,] and Trump and his associates' participation in and enabling of this Russian activity, represents one of the single most grave counterintelligence threats to American national security in the modern era.
In particular, it describes Paul Manafort as "a grave counterintelligence threat" to the Trump campaign. According to the report, "some evidence suggests" that Konstantin Kilimnik, to whom Manafort provided polling data, was directly connected to the Russian theft of Clinton-campaign emails.[9][10] In addition, while Trump's written testimony in the Mueller report stated that he did not recall speaking with Roger Stone about WikiLeaks, the Senate report concludes that "Trump did, in fact, speak with Stone about WikiLeaks and with members of his Campaign about Stone's access to WikiLeaks on multiple occasions".[11]
this the same report that said Russia stole Hillary's emails?Did jimmy dore tell you nothing was going on??
1000+ pages of bipartisan reports detailing Russia coordinated infiltration of the GOP and other orgs such as the NRA to alter the United States election...
this the same report that said Russia stole Hillary's emails?
Did Don Lemon tell you that?
I don't watch cable news.
Could you tell me where the republican lead bipartisan report is wrong and then cite your sources?
I'm happy to read them. I just don't think there's something not credible about that report.
I think you're both talking past each other. You both looked at the same meme and interpreted it differently.I don't watch cable news.
Could you tell me where the republican lead bipartisan report is wrong and then cite your sources?
I'm happy to read them. I just don't think there's something not credible about that report.
A Collusion Reading Diary: What Did the Senate Intelligence Committee Find?
Our summary of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s final report on Russian interference in the 2016 election.www.lawfareblog.com
I'm not reading an entire page reiterating what I already have read to try to find the one thing you think counters. Your link mentions Russia stealing emails. How does that go along with your rhetorical question here?this the same report that said Russia stole Hillary's emails?
Imagine being such a retard you want this thing on a presidential ticket LULZSpeaking of Russian assets:
View: https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1502960938147729413?s=20&t=hmxDZAnzj0TvFEdLvMCZ_g
Seriously. I mean what rational person would want for a biolab to have a ceasefire around it? What's next? Protecting nuclear plants? These Russian assets!Speaking of Russian assets:
View: https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1502960938147729413?s=20&t=hmxDZAnzj0TvFEdLvMCZ_g
Muh biolabsssssSeriously. I mean what rational person would want for a biolab to have a ceasefire around it? What's next? Protecting nuclear plants? These Russian assets!
Tulsi makes mad money from her Putin griftEh Bud, what the hell is wrong with these useful idiots, eh
I honestly don't understand what point you think you're making.Muh biolabsssss